Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here are some reasons I support Kagan's confirmation to the SCOTUS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Seneca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 11:13 AM
Original message
Here are some reasons I support Kagan's confirmation to the SCOTUS
Edited on Tue May-11-10 11:14 AM by Seneca
Anyone who incites this much insanity from the dogmatic conservative wing of the Catholic Church deserves my support. Check out the misogynistic, anti-gay, anti-choice drivel being spewed by these clowns (the bolds were added by me for highlighting):

http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/9270913859.html

WASHINGTON, May 10 /Christian Newswire/ -- Today Catholic Families for America, one of the largest groups of lay Catholics in the country, announced its opposition to the nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court, citing "grave concerns" about her promotion of same-sex "marriage" and abortion, as well as a "dangerous internationalism" that has become fashionable among leftist jurists.

To galvanize citizens' concerns, particularly those of Catholic voters, CFA has initiated a nationwide petition that it will forward to the Senate Judiciary Committee. The petition can be signed.

"By nominating Miss Kagan to the Supreme Court, the president continues to demonstrate a brass-knuckles, Chicago-mobster mentality toward unifying our nation," said Dr. Kevin Roberts, executive director of CFA. "Naming someone who has been so actively hostile to traditional marriage and to the unborn lays bare the president's pro-abortion, anti-family agenda, in spite of what he says to the contrary."

Roberts also expressed considerable angst over Kagan's lurch toward so-called "international law," which he described as "a disturbing, fashionable trend among leftist jurists." He explained further, "By citing foreign laws in their American jurisprudence, liberal judges not only violate the sovereignty of the American people, but also advance a dangerous assault on the notion of the family. This is an affront to Catholic Church teaching, and we are, therefore, adamantly opposed to any public figure who promotes this thinking."


(End of excerpt - more available at the link above)

I love how they put the word marriage in quotation marks after the term same-sex, to mock and de-legitimize it. Also love the Chicago stereotyping. Right out of the Limbaugh/Hannity play book.

As I like to say to these freaks: my karma ran over your dogma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. The enemy of my enemy is my friend?
That is dangerously close to triangulation. It's a great way to be manipulated by the opposition. Let her stand on her own merits, not the objection of those opposed to progressivism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seneca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I do support her on her merits
But anyone who scares the fuck out of right-wing Catholics is okay by me. I don't give a flying fuck what term you want to toss my way, if it makes you feel all pure and holy and good. Go for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. What flew up you?
I responded to your post in a very reasonable manner. You presented your support based upon her opposition. How did that suddenly make me "feel all pure and holy"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Kinda weird huh?
I think your post is exactly correct. Let Kagan stand on her merits. Your post is spot on and it will probably be the main thrust of the Obama people's argument in her favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC