|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:48 AM Original message |
The Hypocrisy here is at Epic Levels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. The dial has been turned all the way to "11" for quite awhile now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. And I'll bet none of the guilty parties will answer to this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. There is absolutely no comparison between upholding the First Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Exactly HOW is she "upholding the corruption of the Bush DoJ."? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Excuse me? What "basic logic" is there in defending a verdict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Basic logic fail: "defending a verdict" that she was not doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:34 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. You cannot deny the stakes in that case. They are public record. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #18 |
26. By your standards of basic logic, a violent crime defense attorney is pro-murder and pro-rape. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Another failed analogy. A defense attorney's duty is to defend his client. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Um, She was an appointed defender for the government for the issue in question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:48 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. And more fail and more bullying. Sorry, friend. Ms. Kagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. The only bullying that's going on around here is a proclamation that she's bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #46 |
63. Please show me that post. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 05:21 PM Response to Reply #63 |
75. I second that emotion. I'd like to see the support for that smear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:04 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. Blah, blah, fail, fail, you are a bully, throw in some self righteous platitudes and baseless claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #51 |
64. Congressional Inquiry Urged in Prosecution of Ex-Governor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:38 AM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Greenwald wasn't their criminal defense attorney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. Fine--Neither Greenwald NOR Kagan should serve on the Supreme Court if they're going to carry water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I'm glad you admit Greenwald's attacks on Kagan are baseless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
24. No, I just admit they should keep Greenwald from the Supreme Court. Not baseless at all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
5. Certain people here will stop at nothing to attack Obama and any and all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
6. .So, let me get this straight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:03 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I got it... Greenwald is special. Kagan, not so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:05 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. no it seems to have gone right over your head, at ground level. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Deleted message |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:58 AM Response to Reply #15 |
47. What part of 'resign' do you think encompasses authority over the case? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:06 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. What is the legal principle Kagan was defending, berni? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:09 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. This is where your hatred for Obama blinds you. She's not "covering Bush ass". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:32 AM Response to Reply #16 |
23. My hatred of Obama? LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
8. there is a minor difference here you might want to address |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. She filed a motion to deny a writ of certiorari. She was the appointed defense for the Gov't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
11. To be honest, I thought they banned Epic Levels 2 years ago, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:11 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. "I love the smell of hyperbole in the morning" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
17. Deleted message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
21. Sorry that you don't seem to understand what the word "hypocrisy" means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Your ridiculous presumption that I have antipathy for Greenwald is just that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #22 |
33. That's sure what it sounds like to me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. The duty of the representative of the government is to represent the government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:52 AM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Officers of the Court take an oath to uphold the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:02 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. What laws did Kagan break? How did she violate the consitution? When will these smears end? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:56 PM Response to Reply #50 |
62. I was speaking directly to your point about what her duty is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:02 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. "You don't GET to decide what the description of that job is." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Point taken. But the theories Kagan presented are being misrepresented by her critics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. we could argue honestly about that, about the OP, not so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. So hypocrisy means lawyers shouldn't do their jobs. Criminals should not have defense attorneys... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Actually, that's berni's argument. Take it up with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:47 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. LOL! Let. Me. Spell. It. For. You. Slowly. You're only point against Kagan is one you blindly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Nope My point is, your analogy doesn't work to an embarrassing degree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Your failure of logic is that it's NOT an analogy. It's a fucking sad reality here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #45 |
61. You are comparing apples and allen wrenches. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
27. The difference is in administering the law vs practicing law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tranche (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
28. It's complicated. Only the superior minds of Greenwaldians can comprehend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
30. Oh wow, I finally get what Siegelman did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Yes, there is that point too, however, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Rove, the all powerful evil genius made Siegleman do that stuf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:16 PM Response to Reply #38 |
67. I have no double standard against Kagan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #30 |
53. WOW!!!! So now we're defending the process in Alabama that so many US attny generals opposed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Elaborate please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. 52 former state attorney generals from both parties wrote letters alleging misconduct in that case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:41 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
35. Lots of chutzpah in writing this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
71. I've said it before and I'll say it again: Berni is the single most kneejerk poster on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. kneejerk -- I'd call it tourrettes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VMI Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
41. Welfare reform? Ban late term abortion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
54. Not exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
48. You just now noticed? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
56. Depending on who you talk to around here, it is always at epic hypocrisy levels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:34 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Your question about how ThinkProgress's endorsement of Kagan will be spun... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #59 |
66. Same here pass the popcorn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
65. If you keep twisting that much, that frequently, you're going to end up at the chiropractor's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. LOLOLOLOL! That's all you got?!?! Bwahahahahah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:42 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Deleted message |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 04:04 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Like Greenwald has so clearly gotten under yours? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 05:10 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Like this post has gotten under yours? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 05:35 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. It hasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC