|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Elwood P Dowd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:30 PM Original message |
Why should DUers back Kagan? After reading these posts, I am sad beyond belief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. The case for an extremely intelligent woman, not to mention a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elwood P Dowd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I might have been born at night, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Had you been, Elwood, I would have strongly praised your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. why not liz cheney? or phyllis schlafly? if being female is the most important thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:09 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Gosh, Hannah. You sure do use naughty words a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:11 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. you're the one who likes fucking kagan because she's a woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:12 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I'm just blushing up a storm over here, Hannah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:15 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. i have a problem with people who think sex, race or religion is the most salient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:17 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. It's one factor and an important one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:20 AM Response to Reply #26 |
30. it's not a damn bit important. it's a myth that tenure makes SC justices "unbeholden," sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:22 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I don't think Poppy would agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:25 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. lol. souter's "turn to the left" = nothing of the sort. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:29 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. If you weigh out the 5-4 votes of recent years, you'll find Souter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:37 AM Response to Reply #42 |
51. the facts are clear; there are no liberals on the court. there are only the fascists (scalia) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:41 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Whoops. Sorry, Hannah. We disagree entirely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:46 AM Response to Reply #55 |
60. I don't need to "cool down," as I'm neither hot nor angry, though you apparently try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:47 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. I'll stand by the point. If you can name a Leftist president, I'll apologize. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Deleted message |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:12 AM Response to Reply #62 |
94. that is not the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #94 |
98. Whoops -- I said nothing of the sort about pressuring the Party or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #98 |
132. dissent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #55 |
122. Perfectly said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
125. Every step forward taken by this nation, including its very formation, came from "the left". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 09:02 AM Response to Reply #125 |
149. I agree with you, which is why I vote the way I do for some decades, Greyhound. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:41 PM Response to Reply #149 |
152. But your position seems to be based on the false premise that that is how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #152 |
154. Incorrect on my "position." I don't have a position insofar as a mechanism, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-13-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #154 |
157. Understood. I'm not sold either way on her, and it is too early for judgment, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
branders seine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #51 |
115. don't listen to this creature, Hannah Bell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:41 PM Response to Reply #115 |
123. I'm a real democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
branders seine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. I didn't tell you anything at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. Well, you said to Hannah Belle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
branders seine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. tell *her* that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 06:32 PM Response to Reply #131 |
136. well, sheesh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:55 PM Response to Reply #123 |
128. Democrat has nothing to do with left/right. For the overwhelming majority of its history, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #123 |
133. you could be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:38 AM Original message |
ya never can tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
57. That's for your separate thread. I think the real drama in High Court's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jefferson23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
156. +100 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:15 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. let's hear them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:19 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. I don't jump through your hoops, dude. You could google it for all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:21 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. your blah blah doesn't make a case for kagan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:23 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. The case for Kagan is on-line in various sources including this site, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:24 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. summers protegee. world bank. meteoric rise. all i need to know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. It's also apparently all you DO know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. i don't give a damn about planned parenthood's rec. abortion is effectively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:44 AM Response to Reply #43 |
59. The people Planned Parenthood have genuinely and effectively assisted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Deleted message |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:51 AM Response to Reply #63 |
70. So evidently you can't name any. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Deleted message |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:58 AM Response to Reply #72 |
80. I do say so. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #80 |
144. yes mr T. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 06:35 PM Response to Reply #41 |
137. Y'Know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:28 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:38 AM Response to Reply #40 |
52. You're free to investigate whatever you please. No one's stopping you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:43 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. you sure have wasted a lot of time saying nothing of substance, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:47 AM Response to Reply #56 |
61. To me, she is entirely qualified and the case for her as the next SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #61 |
67. Deleted message |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:54 AM Response to Reply #52 |
73. ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:23 AM Response to Reply #28 |
36. huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
153. boy comrade bell, the kagan pick sure has you in a teeth grinding mode! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:12 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. you betcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:14 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. You definitely need a new news source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:20 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. did you really miss what I said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:25 AM Response to Reply #31 |
38. Again, if you want to play hula hoops, go outside. I don't do your hoops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. I haven't argued anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:35 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. very weak. she's smart. she's a woman. obama picked her. that's all i need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #46 |
66. If that's all you need, it's not much to run on, and it won't win you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Deleted message |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. If you are interested in a dialogue, Hannah, I'm still up and the candle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:54 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Deleted message |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #66 |
151. You are not interested in dialog, this much is clear to all who read this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 09:03 PM Response to Reply #151 |
155. Yep. You'll have to settle for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:34 AM Response to Reply #38 |
45. he's not pouting, & has expressed no anger. hmm, why would you say he has? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:36 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. missed that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:41 AM Response to Reply #50 |
54. not only pouting, but "pouting through your anger" - now there's a trick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:33 AM Response to Reply #54 |
117. typically dishonsest debate tactics from The Blind Booster Crew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #117 |
145. Deleted message |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #13 |
114. ABSOLUTELY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:32 PM Response to Reply #114 |
146. thanks for that. you seem to be one of only a few who agree on that point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 11:11 PM Response to Reply #146 |
148. oh, say Condi Rice for example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #8 |
68. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. According to news sources, Condi was not nominated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:11 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. As it happens, the President does in fact select SCOTUS nominees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:13 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. with the advice & consent of his -- ahem -- backers & funders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Don't disenfranchise yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:17 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. his advisors & backers have made their choice, you mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:20 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. No, it is not what I meant and it isn't what I typed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:23 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. so what? it's a lousy choice. it's the choice of international finance capital. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:56 AM Response to Reply #34 |
76. Well it sounds like you're living a doomsday scenario. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:57 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Deleted message |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:00 AM Response to Reply #77 |
83. Yet the Kagan nomination is what has you in particular off the tracks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #83 |
93. Deleted message |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #93 |
99. So do Bonnie Raitt and Nina Simone recordings, both of which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:44 AM Response to Reply #99 |
104. Deleted message |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:52 AM Response to Reply #104 |
105. I like all of her albums. Late. Early. All of it. The first two especially, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 07:31 PM Response to Reply #99 |
138. interesting how most of my comments got deleted, including this totally innocuous one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-12-10 09:15 AM Response to Reply #138 |
150. You've stumbled onto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:35 AM Response to Reply #29 |
47. Deleted message |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:55 AM Response to Reply #47 |
75. If it were pathetic I don't think Obama would be on the verge of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:58 AM Response to Reply #75 |
79. not talking about Obama or Kagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:01 AM Response to Reply #79 |
85. Both of which stand unless there's some counterpoint which eclipses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:04 AM Response to Reply #85 |
89. sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:07 AM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Pittsburgh is a great town. I hope we can agree on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:15 AM Response to Reply #91 |
96. I want to destroy the right wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:26 AM Response to Reply #96 |
101. That's not reversible and needs to be, WZF. There is what other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:36 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. I give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:43 AM Response to Reply #102 |
103. Deleted message |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 07:33 PM Response to Reply #102 |
139. sure is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultracase24 (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
21. The more Im reading on Elena Kagan, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:58 AM Response to Reply #21 |
78. Kagan's ideological disposition is less formed than other potential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #78 |
82. true for Clarence Thomas as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:03 AM Response to Reply #82 |
88. Agree, not that it's news. The application holds for ALL Justices. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:03 AM Response to Reply #78 |
87. Goldman Sachs advisor during the bankster meltdown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:05 AM Response to Reply #87 |
90. Not disqualifying. Not even illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:20 AM Response to Reply #90 |
97. rigged processes usually do. prevail, i mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmoney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:35 AM Response to Reply #87 |
118. This alone should disqualify her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultracase24 (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #78 |
92. a lot is not known about her except she is a Washington insider |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. Triangulating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. Don Siegelman is long since forgotten, now that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
49. Deleted message |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #49 |
81. Yes, everything changed and yet nothing changed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:14 AM Response to Reply #81 |
95. not yet ..but we have had bad bad air to breathe..now winds have taken the stink away..for now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #95 |
120. With you on the coast, and with you in your anger towards the corporations & their apologists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
143. I have not forgotten.. . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. Her job as Soliciter General is to represent the position of the US Governement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:01 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. True, but then how do we know her personal views? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 04:53 AM Response to Reply #10 |
108. here's one clue: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
124. Personal views are soft information, nobody can know them for certain except the person who has them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
48. Good point. However it is a sad reminder the Obama is carrying forward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:39 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Deleted message |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:44 AM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Never read Strauss. Is there a particular work of his where this happens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #58 |
100. it used to be on all the Project of the New American Century stuff.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Z. Foster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
86. that could be said of every Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
129. Yup, people quoting her cases as SG (both positive and negative) keep forgetting that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-10-10 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. Obama will protect the Bush crew at all costs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 01:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
84. Someone is keeping a seat warm for him at the Carlyle table. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
11. But today Sean Hannity told me that she's a radical liberal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:05 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. no, she's TRIANGULATED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:15 AM Response to Reply #11 |
113. It's called "gaming the ref" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmoney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:37 AM Response to Reply #11 |
119. And Savage Weiner says she's a "red diaper doper baby" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
65. This DUer doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
106. As Solicitor General, her job is to argue for Obama's policy. So your disagreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 06:19 AM Response to Reply #106 |
110. actually, in her comments to graham during the vetting, she agreed with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #110 |
121. What does that have to do with the Siegelman case, the topic of the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 03:53 AM Response to Original message |
107. There has not been a REAL LIBERAL appointed since Marshall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 06:58 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. John Marshall.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 04:59 AM Response to Original message |
109. Bottom line, they shouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
112. I wish that I could rec this more than once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
116. DUers are a monolithic bloc? Still, DUers don't have to back Kagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
127. Because at the end of the day she will probably vote with Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
134. We are supposed to back her because the president said to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
135. She is the best this Administration would allow. She is too conservative for me but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2 Much Tribulation (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
140. Kagan is no Justice Stevens, she signs briefs arguing for unitary executive power re Gitmo, etc. n/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
141. Obama and the "Centrist" Democratic Party Leadership WILL be successful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
142. I don't. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-11-10 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
147. I still say she's a witch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC