Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Battles Against Financial Reform Bill Amendment To Audit Federal Reserve Board Funds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:07 PM
Original message
White House Battles Against Financial Reform Bill Amendment To Audit Federal Reserve Board Funds

Rahm Emanuel Battles Fed Audit
By Andy Kroll
May 4, 2010

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the lead sponsor of a new rule to audit the Federal Reserve, is running up against some formidable opposition from nearly all sides. Most notably, Sanders told the Huffington Post that his provision, which has a good chance of winning 60 or more votes in the Senate, is opposed by the White House, and that chief of staff Rahm Emanuel has pushing back against the Fed audit. "I think momentum is with us," Sanders told HuffPo. "But I've gotta tell you, that on this amendment, you're taking on all of Wall Street, you're taking on the Fed, obviously, and unfortunately you seem to be taking on the White House, as well. And that's a tough group to beat."

The amendment would allow the Government Accountabililty Office (GAO) unprecedented access to the Fed's records, and would require the opaque, hybrid public-private institution to disclose who received the $2 trillion given out in loans by the Fed since the onset of the financial crisis. To one's surprise, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke and his acolytes have vehemently opposed the provision, saying it would taint the Fed's decision-making with politics and partisanship.

Sanders, though, appears to have considerable support amongst his colleagues in the Senate. A similar provision to audit the Fed, the Sanders-Webb-Bunning-Feingold Amendment, won 59 votes in April 2009, and eight of the "No"s on that 2009 vote have signed onto Sanders' current amendment. And considering that the House passed a similar amendment last year, and that right now Sanders' amendment has the support of 69 senators, it looks as if the white-haired Vermont independent might get his Fed audit after all. The amendment could come up for a vote as early as today.

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/05/rahm-emanuel-battles-fed-audit


----------------------------------------------------



Socialist and arch-conservative senators team up against Obama and the banks on Fed audit
By Jonathan Strong - The Daily Caller
May 5, 2010

An unlikely alliance of liberals and conservatives led by socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders and firebrand conservative Sen. Jim Demint is gaining ground in an effort to audit the Federal Reserve, despite objections by the White House and bank lobbyists.

The provision is “absolutely certain” to get a vote on the Senate floor, Sanders said Tuesday. Sanders said Majority Leader Harry Reid is pushing for his amendment to be subject to a 50-vote majority, rather than a 60-vote super-majority, but that Republicans haven’t agreed to that.

A stand-alone bill, like Sanders’s amendment to financial reform legislation, that would remove restrictions on the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to audit the Fed, has 32 cosponsors in addition to Sanders. Two-thirds are Republicans.

Obama has dispatched chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, originally a Bush appointee, to stop the amendment.

Sanders slammed the administration for opposing the amendment. “Good question!” he responded when asked how White House opposition to the amendment squares with Obama’s transparency pledges. Sanders said he and Emanuel haven’t spoken about the issue.

http://dailycaller.com/2010/05/05/socialist-and-an-arch-conservative-senators-team-up-against-obama-and-the-banks-on-fed-audit/





Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/05/05/socialist-and-an-arch-conservative-senators-team-up-against-obama-and-the-banks-on-fed-audit/#ixzz0n4z6jbol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. So what does the White House fear about this audit? I think the public has a
right to know where the 2 Trillion (of our money) has gone to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. It infuriates me that they are trying to block this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here is my idea :
Break up the FED and take all its assets, which nobody knows and nobody will tell, and distribute their assets proportionally to all the community banks in the nation, according to their defined sizes.

The local banks could lend that money out to any entrepreneur with a worthwhile idea. This would be one of the best stimulus plans ever devised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thats an after thought, but at this point the American people have a right
Edited on Wed May-05-10 01:32 PM by LakeSamish706
to know what has gone on within the fed that they have spent (wasted) 2 Trillion dollars on. Have there been crimes committed that should be dealt with?

So once again, why is the White House and the Fed. so worried about being Audited?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. The White House loves them some TARP fallacy
If Congress goes mucking around then we'll know that the TARP program can no longer be conflated with the real bail out and will more generally be understood to be the tippy top of the iceberg.

People are generally pissed about the little 700 billion but if they have to internalize the full scope their heads will explode and the game will be over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
change_notfinetuning Donating Member (750 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sad. Pathetic. Words are not sufficient to express my disgust with Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. So... Bernanke thinks the GAO is partisan?
Accountability is partisan?
Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. ZeroHedge attempts to explain what may be motivating the whitehouse:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. does Obama have any principles AT ALL?
I'll be writing in Howard Dean or Dennis Kucinich in 2012, unless somebody very progressive runs against him. Let the chips fall where they may--D, R--what difference does it make anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC