Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anatomy of a BOP- Blowout Preventer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:16 AM
Original message
Anatomy of a BOP- Blowout Preventer


Shear Rams: shear ram
A blowout preventer (BOP) closing element fitted with hardened tool steel blades designed to cut the drillpipe when the BOP is closed. A shear ram is normally used as a last resort to regain pressure control of a well that is flowing. Once the drillpipe is cut (or sheared) by the shear rams, it is usually left hanging in the BOP stack, and kill operations become more difficult. The joint of drillpipe is destroyed in the process, but the rest of the drillstring is unharmed by the operation of shear rams.

Shear-seal BOP (Blind Ram)
An item of pressure-control equipment often fitted to the wellhead during well-intervention operations on live wells. Most commonly associated with coiled tubing operations, the shear-seal BOP is a ram-type preventer that performs the dual functions of shearing or cutting the tubing string and then fully closing to provide isolation or sealing of the wellbore. Shear-seal BOPs are most commonly used in offshore or high-pressure applications where an additional contingency pressure barrier is required.

Annular blowout preventer:
A large valve used to control wellbore fluids. In this type of valve, the sealing element resembles a large rubber doughnut that is mechanically squeezed inward to seal on either pipe (drill collar, drillpipe, casing, or tubing) or the openhole. The ability to seal on a variety of pipe sizes is one advantage the annular blowout preventer has over the ram blowout preventer. Most blowout preventer (BOP) stacks contain at least one annular BOP at the top of the BOP stack, and one or more ram-type preventers below. While not considered as reliable in sealing over the openhole as around tubulars, the elastomeric sealing doughnut is required by API specifications to seal adequately over the openhole as part of its certification process.

More oilfield drilling definitions: http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com

Cameron is the company that makes BOPs:
BOPs on the Deep Horizon well-
BOP 2 x Cameron Type TL 18¾in 15K double preventers;
1 x Cameron Type TL 18¾in 15K single preventer;
1 x Cameron DWHC 18¾in 15K wellhead connector
http://www.deepwater.com/fw/main/Deepwater-Horizon-56C17.html?LayoutID=17



Cameron site: http://www.c-a-m.com/index.cfm#

More than you ever wanted to know. None of it worked.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for your very informative posts on the
disaster in the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. What can I say?
Edited on Sun May-02-10 08:34 AM by Are_grits_groceries
I was a geohydrology major which is germaine. I just looooooooove schematics at 5am. I did it in college because I never studied ahead of time. *snort*

Thank you by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. seconded

love the information, thanks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. None of it worked, and they didn't have a Plan B
to deal with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't think these BOPs
were so hot either. In addition, there are a lot of welds that may have been substandard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Weren't they cementing the gap between the ground and the pipe....
at the time of the explosion? If the failure was there, wouldn't that make the BOP irrelevant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Probably.
However, whatever they are saying is CYA crap. It was probably some secret Blackwater mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yep
cement being cement it does fail, it cracks upon setting sometimes and in a case like this that would render it as if it weren't there to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. None of it worked
No matter if they do finally get it to stop flowing it won't matter cause much damage has already been done and or set in motion to be done. At that depths I'm not sure they are going to be able to stop this until this wells pressure equalizes with the water pressure on it. I'm not sure how much pressure is on an oil well or if all have pressure on them but I've seen pictures of them that were spewing oil bunches of feet into the air. The water pressure at that depth is somewhere around a ton per square inch. Man damn sure ain't going to go down there and do any work thats for sure. It'll have to be done remotely with robots. I have a lot of faith in robots in a manufacturing setting but not so much in water that is a mile deep.

This is a big fucking thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. They would try to drill
Edited on Sun May-02-10 08:36 AM by Are_grits_groceries
in the Marianis Trench if there was oil there.

Edit to add: I'll bet Liz Cheney is scuttling around like a crab at the wellhead in some super-secret suit to make it appear that Halliburton wasn't at fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. I'd bet money that her and daddy are busy this morning
trying to cover their halliburton asses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. K & R!
Thanks...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. tHANKS FOR TH EGREAT INFO
http://www.marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1790422&spid=32364

Here is an interview with a member of TWH crew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Variation in International Law
I saw speculation that US laws were lax on what safety measures were required as compared to drilling in the North Sea, etc.

My research (various Google searches) was not enlightening. Anybody have any vetted references???

thx,

Scuba
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Try this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Can't find the link I need but here is some more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Interesting, but none of these references address legal variations
I'd be interested in knowing which of our elected representatives, if any, accepted donations from big oil and then voted for less stringent regulations than otherwise might have been imposed. Any help appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC