Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where Obama shares blame for failing to prevent Gulf oil spill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:02 AM
Original message
Where Obama shares blame for failing to prevent Gulf oil spill
Edited on Sat May-01-10 11:09 AM by G_j
http://trueslant.com/level/2010/04/30/obama-shares-blame-for-failing-to-prevent-gulf-of-mexico-oil-spill/

Obama shares blame for failing to prevent Gulf of Mexico oil spill

Michael Roston

<snip>
The White House announced today that there would be a freeze on new offshore drilling until investigators figured out what happened to the TransOcean/BP rig that’s causing all the trouble. This is a pretty empty gesture when you consider that a lot of the major new drilling plans weren’t set to come on line for years. And while parsing the political ramifications and who gets the blame, it’s worth looking at what the Obama administration’s policy has been on safety regulations concerning offshore oil drilling. An examination of some budget documents released earlier this year suggests that the Team Obama’s head has been in the wrong place where safety in offshore oil drilling is concerned give its importance to his energy policy.

The agency charged with enforcing safety regulations on offshore oil rigs is the Minerals Management Service, nestled within the Department of Interior. The MMS, you might recall, was implicated in a doozy of a scandal toward the end of the Bush administration. The part of the agency that was supposed to be ensuring the federal government collected royalties owed to the American people by companies drilling on federal lands had been completely bought off by the very corporations they were regulating. Justin Rood, then at Talking Points Memo, memorably named the scandal ‘sex-for-oil‘ because of findings of ‘improper social ties’ between MMS staff and oil and gas industry executives (oh yeah, they also called it ‘Lubrigate‘). And that was just the salacious part of the scandal – the financial loss to the American public as a consequence of the cozy relationship between MMS regulators and the companies they were collecting from remains difficult to calculate.

Since the Obama administration has come into office, it has taken a path with MMS that would not suggest that safety was its primary concerns where offshore drilling was concerned.

For instance, the budget for safety remained relatively flat, growing by about $3 million from FY2009 to FY2010, the transition from the Bush to the Obama administration, and then seeing an the budget rise about $119,000 more for this coming year.

At the same time, MMS established some new principles for safety inspection concerned more with risk assessment than covering every facility. The most recent budget request from the Department of Interior states outright that “MMS focuses compliance efforts on those operators whose performance does not meet certain targets.” What this means is that they are focused on the facilities with the greatest risk. And to that end, MMS explained in its budget request that while it completed around 27,000 inspections in FY2009 (the last year of the Bush administration), it anticipated completing fewer inspections in both ‘10 and ‘11 – 22,000 and 23,000 respectively. And for that reason, it’s possible that TransOcean’s Deepwater Horizon may not have been on its radar screen.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very weak argument

Did Obama propose a $3 million increase in his budget, or was that what Congress left him with after they got done with it?

And focusing on facilities with the greatest risk is how you manage limited resources.


TransOcean's Deepwater Horizon may not have been on Obama's radar because BP said in 2009 that nothing could ever go wrong at the facility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. oh, well that makes sense
"because BP said in 2009 that nothing could ever go wrong at the facility."

And contining a policy of voluntary, self-regulation of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations is obviously effective government policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. No Kidding. We Must Look FORWARD
who would have thought it? Nobody Could Imagine...NCI is the new acronym for government CYA policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBI_Un_Sub Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This was a Cheney mess up
He's the Big Oil "lobbyist" who signed off on waiving emergency cut off valves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is not "sex-for-oil"(Lubrigate) symptomatic of the holistic corruption that reigned during junior's
reign, but were even one of the present-day howling hyenas howling then about even one of the ubiquitous "-gates?" :shrug: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Recap: MMS sucks, plus Obama didn't give them more money to suck. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. well then what had been done?
besides making drilling a major component of a climate bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another story of corporate greed winning out over government
Edited on Sat May-01-10 11:45 AM by Rex
'regulators' wow Dick & Bush really weakened every part of the Fed government. I'm surprised we regulate anything, anymore. Hell, they pay us money I'm sure they know what is right for America. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. watch Food Inc.
for another example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another truncated nonsense
This is a pretty empty gesture when you consider that a lot of the major new drilling plans Warren’t set to come on line for years. And while parsing the political ramifications and who gets the blame, it’s worth looking at what the Obama administration’s policy has been on safety regulations concerning offshore oil drilling. An examination of some budget documents released earlier this year suggests that the Team Obama’s head has been in the wrong place where safety in offshore oil drilling is concerned give its importance to his energy policy.


Are you shitting me?

Since the Obama administration has come into office, it has taken a path with MMS that would not suggest that safety was its primary concerns where offshore drilling was concerned.


:rofl:

What a laughable assertion, want to try again?



:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. your responses to the quotes
you posted, have no substance.
At least the article provided some links,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. 'Are you shitting me?' is what passes as debate these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. don't forget the smilies
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Jokes on you dude
try giving me something to discuss rather than some trumped up flamebait BS.

I've outlined what I think is BS now instead of acting like a little
kid playing with the scissors, cut the crap and show how you think this
administration have been negligent? because thats the point your linked
article is trying to make.

So I treated your article like the pittance I think it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. well you have demonstrated
a talent for insults.
With some manners and actual substance you might find you could have a reasonable discussion with someone.

until then...
FAIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC