Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Bush Didn't Make the List (Froomkin on the lack of inclusion of Bush on Times 100)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 05:57 PM
Original message
Why Bush Didn't Make the List (Froomkin on the lack of inclusion of Bush on Times 100)
Why was Bush dropped from Time magazine's list of the 100 most influential people in the world?

AFP reports: "'I think Bush by this point in his presidency probably has less influence than the position should grant him automatically,' Time's Deputy Managing Editor Adi Ignatius told AFP, explaining the decision to ditch Bush.

"'He's a lame duck . . . but his influence is below that of a normal lame duck figure. We just thought Bush was at a low ebb in terms of his influence.'"


Nonsense, it's because they couldn't find anyone to write anything nice about the post-pubescent adolescent psychopath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Okay, first to be fair... Bush is not a psychopath.
Please. He's a sociopath and an addictive personality with delusions of grandeur. Hell, he's even got delusions of compentence. But psychopathy? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Read "Bush on the Couch"....
...you'll change your mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Remote diagnosis is crap when Frist does it. I feel no different when a Dem does it.
My hunch is that the conclusions from Bush on the Couch are very close to right. But it's still an ignorant way to diagnos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC