Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Larry Summers Is Lying about Big Banks"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:07 AM
Original message
"Larry Summers Is Lying about Big Banks"


Last week, Larry Summers, the top economic adviser to President Barack Obama, gave a startlingly dishonest interview with PBS Newshour’s Jeffrey Brown. When asked directly why the White House was not pushing to break up the nation’s largest banking behemoths, Summers responded with a lie that rivals the recent whoppers told by Mitch McConnell. Breaking up the too-big-to-fail financial conglomerates that drove the economy off a cliff in 2008, Summers said, would actually put the economy in jeopardy today:

“It would actually make us less stable, because the individual banks would be less diversified and, therefore, at greater risk of failing, because they wouldn’t have profits in one area to turn to when a different area got in trouble. And most observers believe that dealing with the simultaneous failure of many — many small institutions would actually generate more need for bailouts and reliance on taxpayers than the current economic environment.”

This is wrong in several respects, and Summers is too smart for the error to be an act of incompetence. The economic threat from the simultaneous failure of many small banks was curtailed with the invention of deposit insurance in the 1930s. That’s why the economy didn’t fall apart during the savings and loan crisis, in which thousands of banks failed simultaneously. The S&L crisis was not fun, but it was not anywhere near the scale of what occurred in 2008. The global economy was never in jeopardy of collapse during the S&L crisis—nobody ever thought the entire banking system could completely shut down. By contrast, that was precisely what Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke were afraid of in the fall of 2008.
Moreover, it’s much easier to hold the executives of small banks accountable for their actions. Thousands of bankers were jailed for fraud in the wake of the S&L crisis. We are yet to see a criminal prosecution against executives from large banks over their actions during the most recent crisis, and we know that criminal activity took place. Dozens of local public officials in Jefferson County, Ala. have been jailed for taking bribes from J.P. Morgan Chase bankers. Nobody from J.P. Morgan Chase has faced charges. The economic might of Big Finance insulates its top players from both politicians and prosecutors.

The truth is, today’s megabanks aren’t just too-big-to-fail, they’re too-big-to-regulate. In the years leading up to 2008, big banks went on a predatory lending binge, but regulators didn’t lift a finger to stop them. Between 1995 and 2007, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which regulates the largest banks in the country, took zero public enforcement actions against the eight largest national banks over consumer protection violations. The OCC’s record on ....

snip


http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/04/26/larry-summers-is-lying-about-big-banks/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing more dishonest than a writer calling and OPINION a lie
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Summers' statement flies in the face of reason and fact; opinion or not, it's balderdash
why do you go to such pains to defend one of the original practicioners of reaganomics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I am defending intellectual honestly which should NEVER be sacrificed
in favor of an agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. WTF?
If Summers statements had come out of the mouth of Paulson or some other RW tool, we'd be condemning it. But if it comes from the mouth of Summers we should pretend it's OK?

Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. What's pathetic is your willingness to attack intellectual honesty
to suit an agenda. Now THAT is pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Holy shit.
The irony of that post is so thick my ISP can barely download it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't think you know what the word irony means
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. OK - how about in the dramatic sense.
dramatic irony  - noun
irony that is inherent in speeches or a situation and is understood by the audience but not grasped by the characters in the play.


You are the character in the play. We are the audience. Your character declares a defense of intellectual honestly yet does not grasp the intellectual dishonestly of the Summers statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. it's dishonest to say bad policies and behaviors are suddenly ok!
you are defending bad policies simply on the basic of party and personality

what matters is advancing democratic policies and principles, above party and personality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. correct -- but it does further a specific narrative being pushed here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah that describes it pretty well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. the narrative being pushed is to advance democratic policies & principles, over party or personality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. I get the impression that the smaller banks are weathering ......
this downturn much better than the larger banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. self-delete
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 11:37 AM by progressoid
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Translate "lying" to "full of shit" and continue the discussion of the meat of the matter
instead of waging a war of semantics. Summers is talking fucking crazy and certainly from the perspective of an ideological corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hope for Change =
Hoping for some spare change when I make my cardboard sign pretty soon.

k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Dean Baker: Summers assertion "Not True"
"The U.S. Needs TBTF Banks," Because Larry Summers Says it, Doesn't Mean it's True
Tuesday, 27 April 2010 04:54


The Post has a piece this morning on Delaware Senator Ted Kaufman and his proposal for breaking up the big banks. At one point it presents a quote from Larry Summers, the head of President Obama's National Economic Council: "Most observers who study this believe that to try to break banks up into a lot of little pieces would hurt our ability to try to serve large companies, and hurt the competitiveness of the United States."

It would have been worth pointing out to readers that Summers' asssertion is not obviously true. Many prominent experts on banking, including two current regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents and Simon Johnson, the former chief economist at the IMF, have argued that the country does not need banks that are as large as the too big to fail institutions that would be broken up under Senator Kaufman's amendment.

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC