|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 06:59 PM Original message |
This scares the shit out of me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. um - what is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. The future of the Internet without Net Neutrality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Is it already here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. No.... not yet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Its a "net neutrality failed" access price menu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Realistic, however, DOES describe it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yup. Net neutrality is very important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lakerboy (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ugh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. They want to keep facts away from people on limited incomes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conspirator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. More important: they want to keep limited incomers from broadcasting from their own blogs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. Ew. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
10. If you like paying for cable TV, you'll just love what they want to do to the internet. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. MSNBC and Fox "News" would not be on the same tier. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Fox, I imagine, would always be free with basic service. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Local Fox. Not necessarily the Fox Cable "News" Network. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. If this were to ever happen, I would finally blow a gasket. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bain_sidhe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
17. I don't think that's how they're expecting it to work... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-23-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I know, but I could see it happening! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-22-10 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-23-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
21. K&R. Too many DUers don't understand the risks here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-23-10 03:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I agree, I hope this makes it to the greatest page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-23-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. In Internet Years, it's an oldie but a goodie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-23-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
23. Yikes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-23-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
25. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC