Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is something fundamentally wrong with this MSNBC segment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:25 AM
Original message
There is something fundamentally wrong with this MSNBC segment
that has the wife of the CAUSE of all our financial/economic woes, Andrea Mitchell, involved in the analysis of President Obama's address to Wall Street. Has she absolutely no shame that she sleeps with the man (ewww!) who caused all this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it's wrong. But a 'conflict of interest' is considered cute and old-fashioned.
Nobody cares about conflicts of interest anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. she surely must live in a blind bliss of ignorance
to be able to continue spewing "facts" our way. amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. No, she is an unabashed part of the problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. well, she's no prize herself so I would think that they find each other quite attractive
She loves his wrinkles, he loves her acne scars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. That is fucking STUPID. What do her looks have to do with squat?
I get tired of pelosi is ugly, Hillary beast. Milf Bachmann and Palin. Women are humans. Sometimes they are attractive, sometimes not. What business is it of yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Look, the OP made a judgement in regards to the old man, why are you not jumping down his throat?
Oh, double standards I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Didnt see it. Jsut dont like a woman only being her flesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. self-deleted
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 01:18 AM by Duppers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep
Time for her to be yanked off the air. Way past time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Write to MSNBC and point this out to them.
It seems that David Shuster should have been doing this, but he got fired, er suspended indefinitely. However, how about Lawrence O'Donnell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. BINGO. And reason #4,317 why I don't watch MSNBC. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I stopped watching regularly too. I mostly only watch for breaking
action like the President's address this morning. And then only MSNBC. I'll also tune in to Dylan, Keith, Rachel, and sometimes Ed. But most of their good stuff is available online or in later repeats. I quit watching CNN even longer ago. Network news? I haven't watched network news in so long that I only recently found out that Diane Sawyer is an evening anchor now and George Steph- took her place on GMA. I no longer watch any Sunday news programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I gave up the Sunday chat shows too. I look to print, online and dead trees now. It's edited and
generally more thoughtful than one person's rantings, which are what TV news and weblogs have become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. The President isn't exactly setting the tone wrt conflicts of interest and Goldman Sachs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. excellent point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not to worry.
They have separate coffins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. She should recuse herself from all financial news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. at least she is willing to admit that the Repukes are fucked on this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. Oh yes!! I was thinking the exact same thing today. nt.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. Conflict of interest died with the 2000 Selection.
I'm surprised we got Habeas back as fast as we did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC