Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama-signed law will let militia pack heat at rally

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:26 AM
Original message
Obama-signed law will let militia pack heat at rally
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0419/obama-signed-law-protesters-pack-heat-rally-protesting/

Obama-signed law will let militia pack heat at rally

By Raw Story
Monday, April 19th, 2010 -- 9:36 am

A few miles from the White House, anti-government protesters will be brandishing guns, rifles, and cartridges of ammunition.

Civil war? Nope. Just an anti-government militia protest in a national park, where activists will be able to legally carry multiple weapons in open sight.

The gun-backers' "Restore the Constitution" rally is set to be the first armed protest in a US national park, held at Fort Hunt and Gravelly Point, Virginia, locales run by the National Park Service. Their target? President Barack Obama and his agenda, health-care reform, climate control and bank bailouts.

It turns out, however, that it's President Obama who actually made their rally possible. In May 2009, he signed a measure allowing Americans to carry guns in national parks into law.

<snip>


According to The Washington Post, which reported on the protest Monday, those in attendance at the rally will include: "Mike Vanderboegh, who advocated throwing bricks through the windows of Democrats who voted for the health-care bill; Tom Fernandez, who has established a nationwide call tree to mobilize an armed resistance to any government order to seize firearms; and former Arizona sheriff Richard Mack, who refused to enforce the Brady law and then won a Supreme Court verdict that weakened its background-check provisions."

The Post noted that activists have "full support of the federal government they fear."

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama is going to take their guns away...er, maybe not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I have it on reliable DU authority
That that is exactly the case. So, be afraid, be very afraid, that all your bang-bang are belong to us. While it may not look that way to some of us (the ones I like to refer to as "the sane"), there can be no doubt that this is precisely what "gun-grabbing" looks like.

Or so I'm told. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. So Obama loosened gun laws and cut taxes and they're protesting tighter gun laws and more taxes.
Makes sense! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Typical RW thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. if Beck etc. told them water was no longer wet
they would believe it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. not "loosened gun laws" , "strengthened rights to keep and bear arms"
the proper frame and all

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. That's looking for hairs on an egg, to use a Brazilian saying. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. would you say "loosened abortion laws" or "strengthened right to choose"?
i know which way i'd say it

same thing

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Neither of these is anything a normal person would say.
Let me try: "lifted restrictions on abortion". Yeah, that looks normal and non-hysterical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I think "loosened gun laws" is more accurate than "strengthening RKBA."
Strengthening RKBA is misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. "crazy ridiculous" works for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. I bet an office FReep they wouldn't outlaw boomsticks. FReep for all his loudmouthery did not bite.
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 09:40 AM by YOY
He kept on claiming Obama would "take away his guns." I told him that he absolutely would not.

I told him I would be willing to bet 1000 dollars that Obama would not take away his guns. At first he thought he had some easy money...then he renegged.

Shit...shame we cannot make more money on these dupes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Just like the Teabaggers should have been saying "Thank you", so should the gun rights people.
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 09:46 AM by Pirate Smile
RW'ers don't let facts or reality interfer with their fears and paranoia though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. With the facial recognition software we have, this is better than a mob wedding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. A honey pot for teabaggers?

You have a devious mind! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. "cartridges of ammunition"?
Ooohkay..

People who don't know anything about a subject should refrain from writing about that subject.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. There's a reason Obama is abandoning all the gun control advocates.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Only govt and police, whom we trust 100%, should be able to carry guns-you & I are not to be trusted
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 02:38 PM by The Straight Story
The government (which is made up of the public) should be the only ones (like Bush/Cheney at one time) whom we trust. The rest of us need regulated and spied on as we are a threat..... (some sarcasm there)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Can he rescind that?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soulis Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hi there!
Packing heat at rallies.....uh, not good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. so what the fuck are they protesting about???? a black President, that's what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC