Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gary Jackson: Ex-Blackwater President, 4 Others Indicted On Conspiracy, Weapons Charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 04:17 PM
Original message
Gary Jackson: Ex-Blackwater President, 4 Others Indicted On Conspiracy, Weapons Charges
RALEIGH, N.C. — The former president of Blackwater Worldwide was charged Friday with using straw purchases to stockpile automatic weapons at the security firm and filing false documents to cover up gifts given to the King of Jordan.

The federal indictment charges Gary Jackson, 52, who left the company last year in a management shakeup, along with four other former workers. The charges against Jackson include a conspiracy to violate firearms laws, false statements and possession of an unregistered firearm.

Also indicted were former general counsel Andrew Howell, 44; former executive vice president Bill Mathews, 44; former procurement vice president Ana Bundy, 45; and, 65-year-old Ronald Slezak, a former weapons manager.

The charges open a new front of the government's oversight of the sullied security company. Several of the company's contractors have previously been charged with federal crimes for their actions in war zones, but the company's executives have so far weathered a range of investigations.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/16/gary-jackson-exblackwater_n_541046.html

It's gonna take more than a name change and a few execs leaving to clean out this rats' nest. When do we kick Blackwater (Xe) off the government welfare roles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Last two paragraphs of that article are very telling. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. kicking. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why are we using them in the first place ...
Oh yeah, the funnel of large sums of cash to the MIC..

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, yeah, that is it
I was hoping we'd seen the last of these types of assholes on our payroll after the idiot son left office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Here's my theory
We use them because American voters care (at least somewhat) when a member of our armed services is killed in Iraq or Afghanistan. They don't really give a shit when a Blackwater mercenary is killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But if that is correct, then these wars could
go one indefinitely .. I would hope that they would begin to care when the country is bankrupt and we have earned the animosity of every sovereign nation out there. I still think that TPTB want to keep the MIC flush, Eisenhower warned us about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. It's the ultimate way to do things off the books in plain sight
and make a lot of money. I'm surprised the IranContra criminals didn't think of this years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. K + R Perhaps this is the start of some accountability?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. So was Tom Delay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because the King of Jordan
couldn't buy his own guns? How did that conversation go, I wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Luckily the Federal government paid all the seed money for the private military
like many industries the initial costs are paid by the Feds so the profit margin is greater
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptical cynic Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Good
We use mercenaries because they can an will do things our military personnel cannot and will not do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC