Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Padded Bikini for girls withdrawn (for girls as young as 7)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 03:55 PM
Original message
Padded Bikini for girls withdrawn (for girls as young as 7)
Clothing chain Primark has withdrawn the sale of its range of padded bikini tops for girls as young as seven following criticism.

Primark, which is well-known for its heavily discounted brands, has 138 UK stores and 38 in Ireland.

It is the latest chain to face criticism over products considered too adult for youngsters.

Asda has been singled out for a push-up bra aimed at young girls, and Tesco withdrew a pole-dancing kit from its toys section.

Last year WHSmith also withdrew its Playboy stationery, but did not say if that was because the products were sold to children.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8619329.stm

YUK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. just keep hitting them every where they turn and by 12, 13 the girls will know their worth
is merely in their sexuality. the boys will know a girl is only about sexuality to satisfy them. the boys will be condition to objectify all girls. girls will only feel their validation of a human being in being objectified, ergo, dehumanized. then the males and females can all say.....

it is evolutionary behavior, we cant help it, is our dna, pure biology
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. The phrase "WTF?" just isn't enough sometimes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Aw jeez, what's next? Banning fast food?
It's just a choice! And if someone wants to dress his daughter up to look like some pedophile's wet dream, make the youngster feel worthless independent of her sexual characteristics, and feed a dominant culture that objectifies females from the very cradle, we shouldn't stifle the right of a clothing manufacturer to make a buck off it!

Hmmm. Nope. Still sounds stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I'm a gonna bust a Ayn Rand nut over that little gem you just wrote
Now if you could expand that to at least 20 pages, you could have a serious galt speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. I c wut u did thar.
Nice played. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. It's in rather poor taste to draw an analogy between eating unhealthy food
and sexualizing young children.

Just MHO, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I'm not sure it is a bad analogy
Kids want to eat fast food and young girls seem to want these clothes. I know my nieces both wanted bras way before they needed them because the teen stars of their shows all wore them and their friends were getting them. They don't really understand the sexualization part. As an adult you have to be the ones to say no to eating fast food every meal and no to wearing this type of clothing. The capitalism rational seems ok. If enough people say hell no I'm not shopping at your store with these type of brands clearly the stores listened. They clearly felt this would hit their bottom line. So much for the posters whole argument. They floated these products and the grown ups said no. The free market in action :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tesco withdrew a pole-dancing kit from its toys section.

If that had been on SNL or the Onion I would have considered it to far fetched to be funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. it just isnt funny anymore. but we arent doing a whole lot addressing it.
goes along with a lot of things today, we say, could be an onion, and it is a truth. hm, weird world we live in today

shrug

and go on

i hear ya though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. The parent who purchased one should be tossed into a padded cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. This. Make-up. Diet and lo-cal crap. It's ALL about appearance for girls. Sad. Sick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Do they also carry a Stuffed-Crotch version for boys?
Insane. ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. I saw a little girl (about 6 or 7) at the bowling alley a few weeks ago
She had on a skin tight pink spandex top and her jeans had writing on the butt..

"My Heart Belongs to Daddy"

made my skin crawl...

It was a sewn on patch, so it probably was not manufactured that way..but still :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Writing on the butt is very common around here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. GROSS!!!
What it really means is my ass belongs to Daddy
At least, that's what is implied...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. I would seriously investigate the parties involved in these ideas
as to whether they are involved in illegal activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe they will stop the stupid pageants they dress
up the kids at 20 years olds and have them strut like prostitutes showing their wares.

If they are going to have pageants let em dress like the kids they are. I think the parents should be arrested for child abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sad... but hardly surprising.
Children pattern themselves after adults. And look how far too many adults act. Desperately clinging to youth, treating their looks as if they are of paramount importance, it's truly sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Reminds me of Miley Cyrus's 9 year old sister having that
lingerie line. Just lovely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC