Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Liberals Balk at Obama's SCOTUS Front-Runner

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 11:22 PM
Original message
Liberals Balk at Obama's SCOTUS Front-Runner
President Obama has not yet named his nominee to filled John Paul Stevens' seat on the Supreme Court, but the liberal backlash against one of his top candidates is starting to build. Solicitor General Elena Kagan is quickly attracting controversy among liberal pundits for her conservative stances on issues relating to executive privilege and national security. Politico's Ben Smith called Kagan "everybody's frontrunner at the moment," SCOTUSblog's Tom Goldstein anointed her the "prohibitive front-runner," and the New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin predicted she would be Obama's choice. Here's the liberal outcry.

* 'The Case Against Elena Kagan' Salon's Glenn Greenwald leads the charge, saying Kagan would "move further to the Right." He predicts she "could easily end up as the Democrats' version of the Bush-41-appointed David Souter, i.e., someone about whom little is known and ends up for decades embracing a judicial philosophy that is the exact opposite of the one the President's party supports." He is worried about why Kagan was "remaining utterly silent" through years of intense Bush-era legal battles over executive power and national security. He finds "serious red flags" in her record that should deeply concern liberals, he says.

* Not What We Need The American Prospect's Scott Lemieux sighs that Kagan, "while an attractive candidate in some respects, has a record on civil liberties and executive power that strongly suggests she would not be a liberal in this mold either. This would be bad for the development of progressive constitutional values." Instead, "Obama should nominate a sophisticated and tough-minded progressive along the lines of Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan, Legal Adviser of the Department of State Harold Koh, or Judge Diane Wood of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals."

...

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/Liberals-Balk-at-Obamas-SCOTUS-Front-Runner-3209
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. See my rather positive research post about her here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jeffrey Toobin
Isn't he the guy who appears on CNN and whines about the OJ Simpson verdict
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He is a CNN legal analyst

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-10 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. the Solicitor-General is being considered? What a joke.
That's about on the level of George Bush wanting to appoint the White House Counsel to the Supreme Court. Hey Obama, how about appointing a law professor to the court; maybe you came across some good ones in your time teaching law at Chicago????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC