Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ExxonMobil paid no federal income tax in 2009.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:26 AM
Original message
ExxonMobil paid no federal income tax in 2009.
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/04/06/exxon-tax/

ExxonMobil paid no federal income tax in 2009.

Last week, Forbes magazine published what the top U.S. corporations paid in taxes last year. “Most egregious,” Forbes notes, is General Electric, which “generated $10.3 billion in pretax income, but ended up owing nothing to Uncle Sam. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1 billion.” Big Oil giant Exxon Mobil, which last year reported a record $45.2 billion profit, paid the most taxes of any corporation, but none of it went to the IRS:

Exxon tries to limit the tax pain with the help of 20 wholly owned subsidiaries domiciled in the Bahamas, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands that (legally) shelter the cash flow from operations in the likes of Angola, Azerbaijan and Abu Dhabi. No wonder that of $15 billion in income taxes last year, Exxon paid none of it to Uncle Sam, and has tens of billions in earnings permanently reinvested overseas.

Mother Jones’ Adam Weinstein notes that, despite benefiting from corporate welfare in the U.S., Exxon complains about paying high taxes, claiming that it threatens energy innovation research. Pat Garofalo at the Wonk Room notes that big corporations’ tax shelter practices similar to Exxon’s shift a $100 billion annual tax burden onto U.S. taxpayers. In fact, in 2008, the Government Accountability Office found that “two out of every three United States corporations paid no federal income taxes from 1998 through 2005.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is more typical than not. Remember Enron. They had paid no
taxes for 4 years when the company collapsed in disgrace.

Often "Earmarks" by Congress People, are a waiver to some
company to avoid paying taxes that year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is what happens when the rich game the system
America should replace the stars on the us flag with corporate logos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. A reminder that $$$ is power. They have it, we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. point the teabagger in the right direction...corporate persons living free on the hog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Excellent point. They're angry about all the wrong things.
Their anger could be put to much better use if directed toward the things that are actually damaging U.S..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Seems most have no problem with the Federal debt increasing 12-fold since the gipper implemented his
voodoo economics all the while the largest, most profitable corporation and our wealthiest pay a relative modicum in Federal income taxes, so why should I since the only thing at stake is the Republic itself? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. If corporations are people for campaign purposes, why not for tyax purposes?
I very much doubt that an individual who made 10.5 billion dollars last year would pay -- as Exxon-Mobil did -- NO federal taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC