Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Feds found Pfizer too big to nail" This is a Must Read!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 04:54 PM
Original message
"Feds found Pfizer too big to nail" This is a Must Read!
By Drew Griffin and Andy Segal, CNN Special Investigations Unit
April 2, 2010 4:44 p.m. EDT




(CNN) -- Imagine being charged with a crime, but an imaginary friend takes the rap for you.

That is essentially what happened when Pfizer, the world's largest pharmaceutical company, was caught
illegally marketing Bextra, a painkiller that was taken off the market in 2005 because of safety concerns.

When the criminal case was announced last fall, federal officials touted their prosecution as a model for
tough, effective enforcement. "It sends a clear message" to the pharmaceutical industry, said Kevin Perkins,
assistant director of the FBI's Criminal Investigative Division.

But beyond the fanfare, a CNN Special Investigation found another story, one that officials downplayed when
they declared victory. It's a story about the power major pharmaceutical companies have even when they
break the laws intended to protect patients.


MORE: http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/04/02/pfizer.bextra/index.html?hpt=T2

---------------------------------------

Dear god. I read this and couldn't believe it. For the record, I am pleasantly shocked to see something
like this on CNN. Not the kind of story I'd usually expect from them because it's incredibly substantive.
Basically, the feds caught Pfizer marketing off-label uses for a dangerous drug at TWICE the approved
dose, and because Pfizer is SO enormous and makes SO many important medications for Medicaid and Medicare
patients...they couldn't bust them. They instead "busted" a shell company that Pfizer created, and Pfizer
was left with nothing more than a fine that cost them 3 lousy months' worth of profits from that ONE
medication.

We are well and truly OWNED, my friends. They might as well start tattooing our babies with brand names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would NEVER tattoo little Similac and Propeica with brand names! That's sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They'll never tattoo my little C. Alice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. My husband, Nyqil, would never forgive me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why do we have government again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Maybe this will help explain it..
http://www.businessinsider.com/wall-streets-big-growth-sector-is-helping-the-government-hurt-taxpayers-2010-3#ixzz0jz6fqwrz">Wall Street's Brand New Growth Sector: Helping The Government Screw The Taxpayers (Business Insider)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. But if a corporation is a person ...
Edited on Fri Apr-02-10 05:11 PM by damntexdem
then this is like sending a clone to prison for something the original did.

"I will call him Mini-Me."

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. They should send the corpration to prison so it can't do business for 5-7 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. ah yes, the beauty of sub-corporations
many gargantuan companies are actually just holding companies that have ownership of other corporations. the rest of us would think of those other corporations as divisions, but they can be set up in such a way that they are immune from each other in terms of bankruptcy or liability. all that connects them is ownership, and owners' liability is usually limited to their investment. and profits they already sucked out previously are safe (except in a few cases, where they can be deemed a fraudulent conveyance, e.g.)

so you'd think that when you sue a ginormous company, they have deep pockets and can pay whatever the liability is, but in fact, the entity that did damage to you was one of these subsidiary corporations, which only held limited assets and funneled any profits up to the parent corporation.

that's the design.

lovely, huh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. knr - also see this posted in the PV forum with additional links ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Now wait just a damn minute
I thought the bankers oned the U.S. Government, and by extension, us. Or maybe they just own the Senate. I get so confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nationalize them.
Transfer all their drug research to public universities and open source all their products and research.

Let further drug research be directed by medical necessity, not by potential profit.

The only thing influencing the cost of drugs would be the difficulty of the synthesis.

Pharmaceutical corporate executives would have to find real jobs after they are released from prison, maybe something like shoveling shit at an Alaskan chicken farm, hiding out from all the people they screwed over and the families of those they killed.

Nope, they'll say as they wipe the cold sweat of fear from their brows, I was never the CEO of a Pharmaceutical Company. I've always been a chicken shit shoveler. Why do you ask?

I hate these unethical corporate bastards and I support a corporate death penalty.

Try them, convict them, take away their charters, and nationalize them at 50 cents on the dollar. Make their CEOs do a perp walk wearing orange suits and handcuffs as they are marched away into obscurity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. We can't do that!
The Republicans would call Obama a socialist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
30. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just in case anybody ever wondered why we couldn't get drug reimportation
--or bulk purchasing in the so-called "health care reform" bill, now you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. There was never a doubt in my mind
When one of the best chances we had for saving health care dollars (allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices like every advanced nation in the world) was 'negotiated' away before Congress even started work on the legislation, things became pretty clear for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. I agree.
We should be very pissed off about this. This is legitimate outrage.....or it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Small government means THEY have better and MORE lawyers than we do -- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. exactly. that's one of the reasons they want it -- but they really want big corporate government,
minus *anything* that benefits the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You are right --- !!!
Sadly . . .

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. That's what "smaller" government is all about.
It's about "bigger" corporations being above the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Christ... this is fucked up, K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. We're already tattooing our babies with barcodes on the wrist, Secretary Not Sure
So no, I will NOT tattoo a brand name on my baby. Signed, Tylenol Jones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Big Pharma rules K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. "We are well and truly OWNED, my friends."
Yes we are. Too big to fail and too big to nail. Look forward. Is it fascism yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. ttt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Article said if Pfizer failed Medicare & Medicaid would cause Pfizer collapse.
Why? Because any company convicted of a major health care fraud is automatically excluded from Medicare and Medicaid. Convicting Pfizer on Bextra would prevent the company from billing federal health programs for any of its products. It would be a corporate death sentence.

Prosecutors said that excluding Pfizer would most likely lead to Pfizer's collapse, with collateral consequences: disrupting the flow of Pfizer products to Medicare and Medicaid recipients, causing the loss of jobs including those of Pfizer employees who were not involved in the fraud, and causing significant losses for Pfizer shareholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. What rot! Considering the number of jobs Pfizer ended up disposing of anyway?
They're claiming to give a damn about the people who work(ed) for Pfizer?

Trust me they didn't give a damn about any of us.

I didn't work at a plant that manufactured Bextra but they still closed the plant where I used to work.

My grousing aside, the FDA works for the manufacturers not the public. It will bend as far as it can to accommodate manufacturers. So this story doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Agree and how many corporations are in prison for murder? Zero while kids serve time for marijuana
possession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. We only want kids to take legal drugs ...silly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC