Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you see this, too? (New EPA regs sharply restrict mountain top coal removal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:37 AM
Original message
Did you see this, too? (New EPA regs sharply restrict mountain top coal removal)
Edited on Fri Apr-02-10 09:16 AM by bigtree
EPA immediately, effectively bans new mountain top coal removal, Thursday

The White House on Thursday took a giant leap toward eliminating new mountaintop coal mining projects in the Appalachian states, issuing strict new guidelines designed to protect headwater streams by curbing the practice of dumping waste in neighboring valleys.

Announcing the changes, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson said the guidelines are intended to make the standards governing new mountaintop projects “clear and consistent,” following a series of EPA decisions over the past year that stakeholders on all sides of the debate found contradictory.

Yet the practical effect of the new standards — which will require mining operations to control levels of toxins in nearby streams — will be to minimize, if not outright preclude, the dumping of mining waste in valleys adjacent to the projects. Because the coal industry maintains that most mountaintop projects wouldn’t be worth the additional cost of trucking the debris to more distant dumping sites, the guidelines — if properly enforced — could end most new mountaintop projects before they ever begin.

read more: http://washingtonindependent.com/81245/epa-sharply-limits-mountaintop-mining


The Obama administration effectively called time Thursday on one of the most destructive industries in America, proposing new environmental guidelines for mountaintop mining removal.

The move was seen as a bold action from the White House, which has in the past disappointed environmental organisations for failing to move more aggressively on pollution and climate change.

But in a conference call with journalists, just an hour after the administration for the first time finalised regulations setting limits on greenhouse gas emissions from cars, officials spelled out guidelines that they acknowledged would make it virtually impossible for mining companies in Appalachia to carry on with business as usual.

Lisa Jackson, the head of the Enviromental Protection Agency, said today it is unlikely that valley fills would meet the new standards. "You are talking about either no or very few valley fills that are going to be able to meet standards like this," she said. "What the science is telling us is that it would be untrue to say you can have any more than minimal valley fill and not see irreversible damage to stream health."

read more: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/04/02-2


The Environmental Protection Agency has imposed new curbs on the mining practice of mountaintop removal. On Thursday, the EPA said it will no longer allow coal companies to fill neighboring valleys with the rubble from destroyed mountain peaks. EPA Administration Lisa Jackson cited evidence showing so-called “valley fills” pollute surrounding mountain streams. Coal mining companies say the new regulations could bring their operations to a halt. Luke Popovich of the National Mining Association said the new rules are “tantamount to saying the intent is to strictly limit coal mining in Appalachia.” The regulations however will only apply to new mining permits, not existing operations. Amanda Starbuck of the Rainforest Action Network said: “The EPA has confirmed what science tells us, that mountaintop removal is harming water resources and public health in real and measurable ways, which is why these new guidelines should apply to existing mining permits—not just new ones.

watch: http://www.democracynow.org/2010/4/2/headlines/epa_places_new_limits_on_mountaintop_removal


EPA Issues Comprehensive Guidance to Protect Appalachian Communities From Harmful Environmental Impacts of Mountaintop Mining

Release date: 04/01/2010

Contact Information: EPA Press Office, press@epa.gov

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today announced a set of actions to further clarify and strengthen environmental permitting requirements for Appalachian mountaintop removal and other surface coal mining projects, in coordination with federal and state regulatory agencies. Using the best available science and following the law, the comprehensive guidance sets clear benchmarks for preventing significant and irreversible damage to Appalachian watersheds at risk from mining activity.

Mountaintop removal is a form of surface coal mining in which explosives are used to access coal seams, generating large volumes of waste that bury adjacent streams. The resulting waste that then fills valleys and streams can significantly compromise water quality, often causing permanent damage to ecosystems and rendering streams unfit for swimming, fishing and drinking. It is estimated that almost 2,000 miles of Appalachian headwater streams have been buried by mountaintop coal mining.

"The people of Appalachia shouldn't have to choose between a clean, healthy environment in which to raise their families and the jobs they need to support them. That’s why EPA is providing even greater clarity on the direction the agency is taking to confront pollution from mountain top removal,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “We will continue to work with all stakeholders to find a way forward that follows the science and the law. Getting this right is important to Americans who rely on affordable coal to power homes and businesses, as well as coal communities that count on jobs and a livable environment, both during mining and after coal companies move to other sites.”

read more: http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/4145c96189a17239852576f8005867bd!OpenDocument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's *exactly* what Bush would have done.
Edited on Fri Apr-02-10 08:46 AM by Richardo
:^\

...based on what I read on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. the media only focuses on what makes the President look bad.
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Amy had it in her headlines this morning.
This very good news. The curbs need to apply to existing operations, too, but this is a good step!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Cardin Also Urges a Full Ban on Mountaintop Mining
First it was Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) urging an outright ban on mountaintop mining in lieu of new EPA restrictions. And now Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) is echoing that message, issuing a statement that calls on Congress to take up legislation that would prohibit companies from dumping mine waste in streams altogether.

The EPA's guidance for approving mining permits, based on these new scientific studies, will help control the damage caused by mountaintop removal mining. But the science shows us that if we are to truly protect our mountains, streams and the people who depend on them, we must bring the practice of mountaintop removal mining to an end.

more » http://washingtonindependent.com/81299/cardin-also-urges-a-full-ban-on-mountaintop-mining#more-81299
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
32. 100% correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is great news. As a native West Virginian this makes
me so happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I like the agressiveness of Administrator Jackson's reasoning
Should be a hell of a ruckus raised in your state from the industry and their supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes. It has already begun. I was reading a bunch of
articles this morning and the coal industry reps are out there screaming about the economic and employment impacts. This, despite the fact that coal employment has been in decline for decades while production has risen due to the shift from traditional underground mining to strip mining and mountaintop removal.



Quotes from King Coal:

"“We’re deeply concerned by the impact this policy will have on employment and economic activity throughout the Appalachian region,” National Mining Association spokesman Luke Popovich said.

The organization’s figures show surface mines in the six states covered by the policy produced more than 150 million tons of coal and employed nearly 20,500 people in 2008. U.S. production totaled more than 1.17 billion that year.

“To painstakingly try to limit the impacts to one kind of mining operation, to a single industry and to future operations is frankly disingenuous,” Popovich said."

http://www.register-herald.com/todaysfrontpage/x1687696476/New-EPA-rules-to-limit-mountaintop-removal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. This news largely got overlooked
while people were running around like chickens with their heads cut off regarding offshore drilling. Even if Big Oil decided to drill offshore in every spot to which they obtain lease (although I don't expect a single well to get drilled for years), the environmental impact of mountaintop mining for coal was far, far worse. I am exceedingly glad to hear that the EPA is standing firm on this horrific practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Stop It! Yr Raining On A Perfectly Good Piss Parade!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. o sheesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Exactly, the devil is in the details and the press won't report those
There are also some pretty important strings attached to offshore drilling when it comes to drilling in sensitive sites.

Offshore equipment is still booked solid and, while manufacturers are trying to meet increased demand, new equipment won't be coming out until 2012-2017 and new drilling will have to meet some pretty stringent environmental regulations.

Most major new fields in this hemisphere are in the Caribbean. Drilling is likely to remain far offshore, vulnerable to hurricanes, and out of sight of all but the top floors of high rise yuppie condos.

My guess is that Brazil will also have some important restrictions on drilling off their coast, as well, since their elected government is socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. A good thing. Needed doing.
Hard not to say "about time" or "well, duh" or "why the delay". But, in these times, we need to grab on to any good thing possible.

So. Well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Oh noes, that war mongering corporate stooge fooking up again.
Doomed we are. DOOMED!!! Woe is me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Same logic the global warming deniers used when it snowed in DC. Even a blind squirrel gets a nut
every now and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Are you implying that Obama is governing like a blind squirrel. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. No I'm saying no administration can be all bad, but not all bad does not equal good enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent news. Thanks for the info. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. awesome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. I posted on this twice- last night and this morning
I got a meager response. Glad to see your thread is getting some.

k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. heh
I remember quite a few folks who expressed concern here about earlier permits. I'd be interested to see their take on this move. Harder to get folks to express satisfaction or approval here tho . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. probably because you had "agenda"', as usual?...

anyway, i didn't see your posts, but i rec'd this bigtree's one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. ooh, yes. an agenda
get help. you are in dire need of it, honey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. lovely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Excellent!! REC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
25. K&R . //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
27. Yes I have
But I didn't see this thread until now. I gave it a rec for good measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
28. Kick for importance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. very good news
I posted the story also a few days ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC