Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Five-count Indictment Against The Hutaree "Patriots" (PDF) = Possible Revocation of Citizenship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:22 PM
Original message
The Five-count Indictment Against The Hutaree "Patriots" (PDF) = Possible Revocation of Citizenship
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 01:39 PM by Turborama
(CNN) -- Nine people federal prosecutors say belong to a "Christian warrior" militia were accused Monday of plotting to kill a Michigan law enforcement officer and then attack other police at the funeral.

A federal grand jury in Detroit, Michigan, indicted six Michigan residents, two Ohioans and an Indianan on charges of seditious conspiracy, attempted use of weapons of mass destruction, teaching the use of explosive materials and possessing a firearm during a crime of violence, U.S. Attorney Barbara L. McQuade and Andrew Arena, FBI special agent in charge, announced.

The five-count indictment unsealed Monday charges that since August 2008, the defendants, acting as a Lenawee County, Michigan, militia group called the Hutaree, conspired to oppose by force the authority of the U.S. government.

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/03/29/stone.pdf">Read the indictment (PDF)

Attorney General Eric Holder called it "an insidious plan by anti-government extremists."

=snip=

The Southern Poverty Law Center, an Alabama-based nonprofit organization that monitors hate groups and other fringe organizations, lists the Hutaree as a "Patriot" group militia. "Generally, Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the 'New World Order,' engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing or advocate or adhere to extreme anti-government doctrines," the Southern Poverty Law Center said in a report, "http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/spring/rage-on-the-right">Rage on the Right: The Year in Hate and Extremism."

Full article: http://us.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/29/michigan.arrests/index.html?hpt=T1


If found guilty of this count (Count 1) they can have their citizenship revoked, too: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002384----000-.html">§ 2384. Seditious conspiracy

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/8/12/III/III/1481">8 U.S.C. § 1481 : US Code - Section 1481: Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions

=snip=

(7) committing any act of treason against, or attempting by
force to overthrow, or bearing arms against, the United States,
violating or conspiring to violate any of the provisions of
section 2383 of title 18, or willfully performing any act in
violation of section 2385 of title 18, or violating section 2384
of title 18
by engaging in a conspiracy to overthrow, put down,
or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to
levy war against them, if and when he is convicted thereof by a
court martial or by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm... so where should we exile them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Somalia...
where there is no government at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Good choice...
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 03:18 PM by brooklynite
...no national health care, no income taxes, no social security, strong fundamentalist religious belief...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Texas. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Or Idaho. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. We don't want them here. Send them to YOUR state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. If you live in Texas
will you please whip the rest of the yahoos into shape?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. I live in the People's Republic of Austin, TX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Austin doesn't count
So you're good. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. The Marianas Trench
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even the court cannot bring themselves to use the 'T' word (terrorism)
although I'm gratified at use of the words 'seditious conspiracy.' As long as these talibornagain terrorists get convicted, that's the important thing - that and the cautionary tale it dishes up for other wannabee domestic terrorists. I'm also glad to see this story is gaining traction in the corporate media, and unless the repugs are completely & utterly psychotic, they'll STFU in their lame-ass defense of reactionary violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think the term seditious conspiracy is better - it makes
it absolutely clear that this is an attack on America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes
I'm also glad that militia groups in other states (Kentucky, Texas) have been tied to this group as well. These nutzo groups must be called to account for their nefarious plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think "terrorism" is too vague a term. I'd like to see anyone involved
in 9/11 prosecuted under the existing piracy laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zech Marquis The 2nd Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
28. Good use of the word sedition
To me, sedition means you're plotting to attack the government, whereas terrorism is the actual event taking place. But in all honesty, they're one and the same.

Send these bastards to Gitmo and give 'em the Dick Cheney package deal :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Maybe they can call in Bush's 1st Education secretary to do that for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. IIRC you can only revoke citizenship from a NATURALIZED citizen.
If there are any actual attorneys out there who know the law regarding this, maybe they can weigh in.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Restrictions don't apply to any of the charges in paragraph 7
I just double checked and found that out http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/8/12/III/III/1483">here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, but how would that work, logistically? If you revoke US citizenship and he holds no other,
where does he GO? You can't travel internationally without the passport of SOME nation. And we can't dump a former US citizen who plainly has never lived/been a citizen of any other nation. So they get to stay here.

All it would mean is that the person couldn't vote. I doubt these freaks vote anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. one would lose certain rights
For example, such a person wouldn't be allowed to run for most public offices, and things like that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_nationality_law but there is not a whole lot of legal analysis since this sort of thing does not arise very often and when it does it's usually in connection with a different country rather than a purely domestic situation. I'm not going to lose any time wondering about it until the trial has taken place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Good question
Which brings up a http://www.law.utoronto.ca/documents/conferences2/Constitutionalism09-Lavi.pdf">difficult paradox.

I don't know of any precedents to look back on. However, it is the law and it's there to be used if certain cases warrant it.

I just think the idea of one of these "patriots" losing their citizenship, even if it was just to take away their political rights, would send out a very strong message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Technically they become
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 11:41 PM by nadinbrzezinski
people with no nationality and fall under the UN High Commissioner for Refugees jurisdiction... oh the irony.

That said, in practice these guys are facing life in prison. So if they have their citizenship taken away and get to live the rest of their lives in jail, assuming they are indicted and convicted, it is really a technicality. The only reason why I'd see the Feds actually doing that is to send a signal to other militias.

It is rare as can be but the US has removed citizenship before...

And yes I have handled a family who became refugees after the mess in Central America... why I know some of the crazy details, and yes, I will have to leave it at that.

Oh and the technical term is STATELESS PERSON... in case you were wondering, and the UNHCR developed early procedures after WW II with the Displaced Person population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. Maybe the Philip Nolan solution to the problem would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Regarding potential punishment if convicted.....my guess is, these guys are
looking at LIWOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. These good old boys are, as they say, fucked. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Seditious conspiracy" is a very serious charge.
I read the indictment. They are being charged among other things with "conspiracy to wage war against the United States." Does anyone know if that's a capital crime?

I know it would be if they were Muslim. But seeing as how they are white and "Christian," is it still a capital crime? Could they face the death penalty if they were convicted on that charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The laungague used follows the definition of treasons in the Cosntitution..
ARTICLE III
Section 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.

Treason is a capital crime in some states.
Other Statutes allowing the death penalty for non-murder crimes
Treason (Arkansas, Calif., Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Washington)
Aggravated kidnapping (Co., Idaho, Il., Missouri, Mont.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Surprisingly, not more than 20 years
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002384----000-.html">§ 2384. Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Under this, does the Republican Party qualify? They are getting close....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. FReepers are on the defensive
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/militia/index

"thought crimes" pops up a lot

heh





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
26. So the Obama administration wants to play with these toys left over from Bush
Sorry, but I think it is wrong to strip citizens of their citizenship. That also strips them of any legal protection in this country.

Throw them in jail, fine them, what have, but they need to remain citizens, with all the rights and protections that implies. This is a horribly short and slippery slope we would be going down it this law was invoked. Rather it needs to be repealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. I didn't say anything in the OP about the Obama administration wanting "to play with these toys"
It is the law - not sure when it came into power - and just put the possibility of this happening out there for discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
27. has there been
a case where a naturally born US citizen been stripped of their citizenship for the above crime?

If so

1) does the convicted have the right to challenge such a ruling in the federal court system?
2) has the Supreme Court ruled on such a sentence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
32. "Seditious Conspiracy", HOLY SHIT!!!
The Teabaggers are going to be filling their diapers with this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC