Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sec. Napolitano says airport full-body scanners 'do not see everything'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:13 PM
Original message
Sec. Napolitano says airport full-body scanners 'do not see everything'
PHOENIX, Ariz. – Privacy concerns shouldn’t hinder the rapid deployment of controversial full-body scanners at American airports, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said on Thursday.

“Some have expressed concerns about these machines – that they infringe upon privacy,” Napolitano told students and faculty at Arizona State University. “But suffice it to say, many of those worries have been spurred by the continued publication of photos that were taken using older versions of the technology, not the technology that’s actually being deployed today.”

Critics of the machines have said they amount to a technological strip-search.

Napolitano insisted that her department does take privacy concerns “into account.” The Transportation Security Administration officer reading the image is now separated from the person being scanned, Napolitano said. “And I can confirm, no, the machines do not see everything.”

She said the machines would be able to prevent the kind of attack organized on Christmas Day last year, when a Nigerian man wearing explosives in his underwear was able to board a Detroit-bound flight in Amsterdam.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/news/89277-napolitano-says-body-scanners-do-not-see-everything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like see her volunteer
to be scanned and have photos of the scans broadcast on tv and the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. if they can't see your privates
how could they see the explosives in a dude's underwear? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's true. They don't see inside body cavities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That's why all scanning teams are issued a dozen of these
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank You Madame Secretary, please feel free to go first & we can all
watch the video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've seen a scan ...
and trust me, for men anyway, it reveals everything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why don't people fear the ionizing radiation more?
I was forced through one of these, not offered a choice, you're tired and before you know it there you are in the contraption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Stop insulting our intelligence Janet, leave that up to the GOP
You can clearly make out a male's penis in the machines I saw. This is probably why during the live demonstrations on the early morning shows a few months ago they had male reporters hold a large rectangle box in front of their privates.

Meanwhile air marshals can easily smuggle drugs on board planes. http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/02/13/marshals.cocaine/index.html

Gee I feel safe :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. She has as much credibility as her predecessor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. *kick*
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gleaner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. How does she know this?
Does she have a full set of scans of unwary individuals heading out for travel cheer? I think she should go first and let us see her scan. Maybe publish it somewhere. Get a few small shots for her wallet to show friends. Feh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC