Will i dotting and t crossing rescision still occur? Till 2014? forever?

[Gman2]

They call it fraud. Yeah right.

[LoZoccolo]

1. Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? n/t

[Fumesucker]

3. I tried to parse that sentence..

And now my head hurts.

Somehow I get the impression that English is not your first language.

[Gman2]

4. I see NOTHING wrong with the syntax. Clear as a bell.

[Fumesucker]

7. O RLY?

:rofl: :rofl:

:rofl: :rofl:

[Gman2]

8. Fitting the whole question on the first line, aint always easy.

[Fumesucker]

9. Especially when you've misplaced your Martian to English phrasebook..

I must admit that I get a great deal of cheap amusement from LZ sometimes..

[Gman2]

10. What is LZ? Did I do this one right?

[Fumesucker]

11. The poster to whom I originally replied on this thread..

The one who wrote: " Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? n/t"

[Fumesucker]

2. If not rescission then they will simply deny procedures..

They are in business to make as much profit as possible and this bill was written by their lobbyists.

[laughingliberal]

5. I think it will. Providing the loophole without limiting the definition of fraud in the bill

seems to leave it just as it has been. Even with access to an 'external review process' after the internal review process does not help much. The insurance company covers nothing during this time and the partient is much sicker by the time the review process gives them access to treatment, if events go their way. They needed to make it inherent on the insurance companies to prove fraud not the patient to disprove it. That way, treatment could have gone forward. If the patient had been found to engage in fraud, the insurance company could go after them for reimbursement.

[Gman2]

6. That is common sense. Make them sue, to recover. With severe penalties for being wrong.