Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I had a chilling thought: why hasn't our big agriculture been outsourced yet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:01 AM
Original message
I had a chilling thought: why hasn't our big agriculture been outsourced yet?
Admittedly big ag has it good here: giant subsidies, trade policies that make it nearly impossible for other countries to compete, patented crops and on and on.

The downside for them is even the token taxes, labor and environmental laws they have to follow are stricter than they would have to deal with in other countries: as little as illegal immigrant ag workers make, they come here because they can make more here than back home.
Likewise, while big ag can buy off our politicians here, what are the chances they could buy other Mexican, Indian, and Russian politicians for even less?

Obviously, I'm not talking about fruit and other stuff that we already get from all over the world, but wheat, corn, soy, and crops like that.

The other reason they might do it: another economic sector to short until it's dead and its bones are picked clean. And as we have seen with manufacturing, computer programming, and even the mortgage industry, it is much, much, easier to make a business or even whole economic sector fail than to make it succeed, so that is what the spoiled trust fund babies on Wall Street who have been gutting our economy to avoid having to learn how to make anything or provide any service have been doing for the last few decades.

food for thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only because it is physically tied to the productive capacity of the land itself
If they could move it to the Third World, our American Corporatists would, but it is physically impossible.

So they are making our nation Third World, instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. how much is land in Third World countries?
I hope you are right. I was fishing for counter-arguments that would shoot this down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. The reason land in Iowa and Illinois is used is because it can grow a lot of corn and wheat. You
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 05:39 PM by Vincardog
can't get the same yields in Bolivia.
Brazil has some land that can be improved to make serious yields possible.
I have heard rumors of China leasing giant portions of Siberia for its' agricultural potential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I was thinking of arable but underutilized areas like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Chinese pet food and
south american cows, Pakistani chewing gum, called Nuclear Waste, I am not kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. those are all bad, but when have they stopped the financial elite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Most of our wheat does, in fact, come from China and other countries.
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 11:38 AM by SPedigrees
Those "amber waves of grain" are but a distant memory now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. NO Wheat comes from CANADA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Some does, but the bulk of it comes from China now, particularly wheat products like
wheat gluten that are used in bread and other products.
I did say China and other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because the land is here and we illegally insource aliens to harvest it.
Don't worry - big Ag does not have America's best interests at heart. Only profit and illegal labor exploitation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Where have you been, we are buying up all the poor peoples most arable land.
It has been going on for some time. We are expanding for GCC reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. GCC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Can't change the soil. US has some of the best in the world.
It's productive capacities are incredible (even with the terrible chemicals we dump on it which is rapidly depleting it but still. It has a lot of "life" left).

While Big Ag is trying to move on other countries - outsourcing - they are limited in locating arable land that's worth it. This doesn't even get into the other logistics issues: transportation to get the product to market, the equipment to harvest and move it etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Beginning in 2005 the US became a net food importer
They're working on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes, and that allowed Big Ag to make bigger profits off of crops not used for food
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 11:37 AM by Gormy Cuss
such as corn grown for fuel, weed suppression, and other non-food uses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Because big ag are rich republicans nt
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 11:39 AM by daa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. Most big agriculture isn't labor intensive
Corn, soybeans, cattle feedlots don't require lots of workers. Just a few guys with heavy equipment can handle a lot of acreage. Those ag businesses that are labor intensive, like fruit and vegetable growers and meat processing plants have a steady stream of foreign workers, documented and undocumented, to work cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Land available to Corp Farm is in Africa & Saudi's and Dhabi have corp it
What can be used for corporate farm land (what hasn't already been done in South America--which some was taken back through Nationalization of AG--Brazil Venezuela) is in Poor African Nations. Middle Eastern Sheiks in Saudi Arabia, Dhabi, and other places in Mid-East are buying up African Land, corporation it, and bringing the food back to their home countries and pay less then a dollar a day for their labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Because it's being insourced, like nursing jobs, construction, etc;
you need to bring people here to insource in order to destroy American jobs.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC