Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Let’s hear it for Justice Clarence Thomas." Notice: I did not say let's hear from Justice Thomas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 09:45 AM
Original message
"Let’s hear it for Justice Clarence Thomas." Notice: I did not say let's hear from Justice Thomas
Clarence Thomas, Silent but Sure
By LINDA GREENHOUSE


Let’s hear it for Justice Clarence Thomas.

Notice that I did not say let’s hear from Justice Thomas. February 22 was the fourth anniversary of the last time Justice Thomas asked a question during an argument. His silent presence on the bench has evolved into a weirdly compelling example of performance art.

But my point is not to scold him for his obvious disdain of the ritual of appellate argument, an exercise that all the other justices appear to find if not always enlightening, at least worth the effort. (The newest justice, Sonia Sotomayor, has thrown herself into the arguments with gusto, asking pertinent questions with penetrating follow-up).

Rather, I want to call attention to the impressive consistency of the views that he actually expresses in his written opinions — consistency being so unusual a commodity these days that it shouldn’t go unremarked on those rare occasions when an individual holding high public office displays it.

<snip>

The subject is prison, specifically the meaning of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual punishment.” In February 1992, the Supreme Court ruled in Hudson v. McMillian that a prisoner need not have suffered a “significant injury” in order to pursue a lawsuit against prison officials for the use of excessive force. Keith Hudson, the Louisiana inmate who brought that case, had been kicked and punched by three guards while he was handcuffed and shackled. He suffered bruises, swelling and loosened teeth, injuries that a federal appeals court, in dismissing his lawsuit, deemed so minor as to be beneath the notice of the Eighth Amendment.


read the entire well crafted piece here
and be reminded just how grateful we are to have Obama in office for when the time comes to replace the Neanderthal judges one at a time

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/11/clarence-thomas-silent-but-sure/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R #1 for FOUR yrs' anniversary!1 Well, he's KNOWN as embarrassment-impaired!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. maybe his wife should take his place? She's not embarrassed to show
her ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I just found your comment, and it is making me laugh out loud.
So true. Two buffoons who found each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC