Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarence Thomas AND his wife are nothing but a huge disgrace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:26 PM
Original message
Clarence Thomas AND his wife are nothing but a huge disgrace
I remember that slug ("Mrs." Thomas) had a role in the G. W. Bush recount in 2000.

The witch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R)
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 07:30 PM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. K and fucking R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank God you didn't post this in LBN!
This is OLD news.

But it's good to remind people.

KNR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. These people think they are Royal Nobility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. P.S. Don't forget their connection to Emperor Moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. How the FUCK can this be good? How can this be acceptable?They are FLAUNTING THE SYSTEM in our FACES
The Need for :WIN : Greed: knows no bounds...

This is gonna HURT the Tea SUCKERS no end.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow. Any link?
Not that I'm doubting. This is just the first I've heard of her prior record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. i'll see if I can find something
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. on edit
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 07:46 PM by CatWoman
this was all I could find:

In 1994, Thomas worked for Representative Dick Armey, as a policy analyst.<19><20> Conflict of interest issues were also raised in 2000, when Thomas worked for the Heritage Foundation, collecting résumés for potential presidential appointments in the George W. Bush Administration.<21><22> Thomas later served as White House liaison to the Heritage Foundation.<23><2>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Lamp_Thomas

I think it was thru her affiliation with the Heritage Foundation that she was working on the Chimp side of the recount.

also found this Common Dreams article:

Job of Clarence Thomas's Wife Raises Conflict-of-Interest Questions
by Christopher Marquis

WASHINGTON, Dec. 11 The wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said today that she was working at a conservative research group gathering resumes for appointments in a possible Bush administration but that she saw no conflict between her job and her husband's deliberations on a case that could decide the presidency.

The comments from the justice's wife, Virginia Lamp Thomas, a former Republican Congressional aide, came as a federal judge in Nashville said Justice Thomas faced a serious conflict of interest as a result of his wife's work for the Heritage Foundation.

The foundation has close ties to the Republican Party and would probably have a say in the hiring of key government officials if Gov. George W. Bush assumed the presidency. In e-mail distributed on Capitol Hill earlier this month, Mrs. Thomas solicited resumes "for transition purposes" from the government oversight committees of Congress.

A decision by Justice Thomas to recuse himself could alter the outcome of the case now before the court, which is weighing whether to allow a manual recount of votes in Florida. On Saturday, by a vote of 5 to 4, the court blocked the recount for now. Justice Thomas, who was appointed to the court by President George Bush, Governor Bush's father, was in the majority.

If Justice Thomas were to recuse himself, it could result in a 4-to-4 tie in the case now before it, which would allow the ruling by the Florida Supreme Court to stand.

"There is no conflict here," Mrs. Thomas said in an interview. She insisted that she rarely discussed matters before the Supreme Court with her husband and that Justice Thomas therefore should not consider recusing himself from the landmark case.


http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/121200-02.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Holy shit
She "solicited resumes "for transition purposes" from Congress?

A USSC justice's wife should STAY AWAY from Congress at all costs.

This is much worse than "the appearance of impropriety".

It's naked partisan politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm convinced that they're those "Men in Black" type aliens, wearing human skins.....
..... and not very convincing ones at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Alito dissing the President. Roberts whining like a schoolboy. Now Thomas's wife...
What the fuck is it with Republicans? They truly are a disgrace to our country. All three of the justices I just mentioned have no business being on the court. They are nothing but unqualified (literally, no substantial prior qualifications) partisan hacks.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apples and oranges Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Did you see the piece Lawrence just did?
When teabaggers see those photos of the happy couple, something tells me Mrs. Thomas won't emerge as the new teabag leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's like the understatement of the millinium...
Clarence Thomas has to be the absolute WORST excuse EVER for a Supreme Court justice and it STILl disgusts me to this day that HE was the replacement for Thurogood Marshall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. for a minute there i thought you were going old school on them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. So very true. Damn those right-wing couples.
Nothing but trouble, if you ask me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. HA!!
:hi:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC