Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fifteen states have polluter-driven resolutions to deny climate threat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:17 AM
Original message
Fifteen states have polluter-driven resolutions to deny climate threat
"All politics is local." Former Democratic House Speaker Tip O'Neill

We need to start defeating some of these folks at the local state government levels.


Yesterday, the South Dakota legislature passed a resolution telling public schools to teach "balance" about the "prejudiced" science of climate change by a vote of 37-33. Earlier language that ascribed "astrological" influences to global warming was stripped from the final version.

This act of conspiracy-driven ideology is hardly alone -- a Wonk Room investigation has found at least 15 state legislatures attempting to prevent limits on greenhouse gas pollution. The states of Alabama and Utah have already adopted resolutions calling for the overturn of the Environmental Protection Agency's global warming endangerment finding, with legislators in 13 more states in tow. Several of these "Dirty Air Act" resolutions argue that the overwhelming scientific consensus on the threat of man-made global warming is actually a conspiracy...

~snip~

Every resolution makes the false claim that protecting citizens from hazardous climate pollution would hurt the economy, instead of recognizing the potential of a green recovery...

~snip~

The most legally bizarre resolution is Arizona state senator Sylvia Allen's (R-Ariz.) "tenther" argument that the U.S. Congress does not have the Constitutional authority to regulate greenhouse gas pollution. Allen also believes the Earth is 6000 years old. The other Arizona resolution, along with the Kentucky, Virginia, and Washington resolutions, would attempt to block state enforcement of global warming rules.

~snip~
http://www.grist.org/article/2010-03-02-fifteen-states-have-polluter-driven-resolutions-to-deny-climate/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. This should deal with the issue - make Global Warming illegal!
As before, for those who are curious about the science, I suggest looking at Skeptical Science

For those who are only interested in blind belief, please contact Senator Sylvia Allen.


We Have No Planet-B


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. They should be forced to buy carbon offsets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lysenkoism...
...from

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

Lysenkoism is used colloquially to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives.

(...)

The word is derived from a set of political and social campaigns in science and agriculture by the director of the Soviet Lenin All-Union Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Trofim Denisovich Lysenko and his followers, which began in the late 1920s and formally ended in 1964.


I remember when we used to make fun of it and laugh at the USSR for every having operated in such an irrational manner in their sciences.

The joke's on us now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I had no idea there was a specific term for it.
Thanks, ljm2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. What? South Carolina isn't on that list?
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 10:25 AM by GoCubsGo
I'm stunned. Too busy trying to sue the Obama Administration for closing Yucca Mt., I guess. I am sure my state legislature will jump on the bandwagon soon, embarrassments that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC