Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glaxo Pays Out $1 Billion in Birth Defect Cases with 600 Lawsuits to Go

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:08 AM
Original message
Glaxo Pays Out $1 Billion in Birth Defect Cases with 600 Lawsuits to Go
Glaxo Pays Out $1 Billion in Birth Defect Cases with 600 Lawsuits to Go
Thursday, March 04, 2010

Paxil, one of the nation’s leading anti-depressant medications, has cost its manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, nearly $1 billion in damages from numerous lawsuits since the drug first became available in 1992.

The review and approval process by the Food and Drug Administration that allowed Paxil to go on the market did not foresee problems the drug would cause for pregnant women, many of whom gave birth to children with serious health defects. Glaxo’s legal troubles aren’t expected to get any easier, as more than 600 other lawsuits involving Paxil and birth defects are waiting to be resolved.

Some of the earlier settlements have resulted in Glaxo paying out an average of $4 million to plaintiffs. After the conclusion of one case, jurors said they decided against the pharmaceutical company in part because it did not bother to do enough testing on the effects of Paxil.

The FDA did not reclassify Paxil as a medication potentially dangerous to pregnancies until 2005.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/Glaxo_Pays_Out_1_Billion_Dollars_in_Birth_Defect_Cases_with_600_Lawsuits_to_Go_100304

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. You'd have thought
that after the issues with thalidomide that all drugs would either be screened as safe for use with pregnant women or
clearly marked as non safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC