Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times - Al Gore - "We Can’t Wish Away Climate Change"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:14 PM
Original message
NY Times - Al Gore - "We Can’t Wish Away Climate Change"
The climate deniers, of course, would probably reject a novel by Ernest Hemingway as great literature if they found a typo on their copy. Likewise, they seize on isolated errors by individual scientists to reject the reality of climate change out of hand. Here is Al Gore putting the current assault on climate change science in perspective:


We Can’t Wish Away Climate Change

It would be an enormous relief if the recent attacks on the science of global warming actually indicated that we do not face an unimaginable calamity requiring large-scale, preventive measures to protect human civilization as we know it.

Of course, we would still need to deal with the national security risks of our growing dependence on a global oil market dominated by dwindling reserves in the most unstable region of the world, and the economic risks of sending hundreds of billions of dollars a year overseas in return for that oil. And we would still trail China in the race to develop smart grids, fast trains, solar power, wind, geothermal and other renewable sources of energy — the most important sources of new jobs in the 21st century.

But what a burden would be lifted! We would no longer have to worry that our grandchildren would one day look back on us as a criminal generation that had selfishly and blithely ignored clear warnings that their fate was in our hands. We could instead celebrate the naysayers who had doggedly persisted in proving that every major National Academy of Sciences report on climate change had simply made a huge mistake.

I, for one, genuinely wish that the climate crisis were an illusion. But unfortunately, the reality of the danger we are courting has not been changed by the discovery of at least two mistakes in the thousands of pages of careful scientific work over the last 22 years by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In fact, the crisis is still growing because we are continuing to dump 90 million tons of global-warming pollution every 24 hours into the atmosphere — as if it were an open sewer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minimus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just today I overheard a couple of women discussing all of the snow
and saying it just proves global warming is a myth.... I had to bite my tongue because I did not want to get thrown out of the salon before getting my manicure.

Idiots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Just as it’s important not to miss the forest for the trees, ...
... neither should we miss the climate for the snowstorm."

My favorite quote from the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's an excellent read, I believe Al touches all the bases.
Thanks for the thread, TomCADem.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-28-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yet, the Corporate Media Is Trying To Portray Established Science As In Dispute
It is like the evolution versus creationism "controversy." There is no controversy. Just a bunch of nuts with an inordinate amount of media coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I believe that's because the corporate media have a major conflict of interest to overcome.
Exxon and much of the established fossil fuel industry's profits are at stake and the corporate media in turn benefits from those profits in the form of selling commercials and advertising.

I believe the tide will turn as to corporate media coverage of fact and fiction when sustainable industries outstrip fossil fuel industries in commercial and advertising purchases or when mega shit hits the fan, I hope it's the former.

The vast majority of the corporate media aren't leaders when the path conflicts with own their perceived self-interest, at best they're reluctant followers, if not out right obstructionists.

That's why scientific consensus and studies; confirming human influenced global warming climate change far outstrip news media coverage both in quantity and confidence.

Just follow the dollars, because the corporate media sure does.

If the fossil fuel industry had any vision, they would consider them selves energy companies first and oil/coal industries second or third and they would use their financial resources to fund alternative, sustainable energy in a big way.

There is no reason oil companies can't convert to solar or coal companies to wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. They can believe whatever they want
it doesn't change things, we'll see whose right in a few years. If wishes came true I would wish Gore was wrong to but ... I remember wishing my mother's cancer would go away ... she died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-28-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. It is a crying shame that this man was never President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. You can wish smoking didn't cause cancer and heart disease
You can nitpick scientific studies to help sustain your wishes.

But sooner or later you have to face the facts. Same with global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC