Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Navy says they're only expecting a 2 foot surge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:13 PM
Original message
US Navy says they're only expecting a 2 foot surge
in Hawaii. They're evacuating some places but not sending ships to sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Famous last words....hope they're right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. True since the Weather Channel has detected a tsunami
2900 nautical miles from Hilo heading for Hawaii.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If there is any group on the face of the earth that understands wave behavior its is the US Navy
No ship will be put in peril. You can bet anything on the face of the earth you like that within moments of that quake there were super computers modeling the waves that would result with no other purpose on the face of this earth than to give warning to our Navy. You can also bet that no expense what so ever was spared in doing the modeling or on the equipment which performs the calculations, nor on the communications system that relayed the results to the commands of that same Navy.

Really, they don't play games with this sort of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Well they were very close
They said two feet and it was three feet - Bravo Navy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hope so too.
I heard earlier reports that the tsunami was fizzling - hope they're true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the quake were in deeper waters and not near the coast, the tsunami would be monstrous.
The tsunami that killed 250,000 people in 2004 across South Asia occurred in deep water, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It was also much closer to the shore that it hit.
As the wave travels from Chile to Hawaii, it is also spreading out in other directions, so the wave weakens. Some of it goes south, some south-west, some west, etc. across 180 degrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here are some links to Hawaii news reports of the warning and size:
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/

http://www.co.hawaii.hi.us/cd/tsunami/maps.htm

Looks like 2.5 feet predicted on the Big Island and about 39 inches expected on Oahu. . .

Interesting news reports. . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kagi Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Protected harbors and exposed locations...
Most of the Navy's ships are in protected harbors that wouldn't see much of a surge from the tsunami, but places like Hilo which aren't typically a harborage for Navy ships are likely to feel a lot more impact. So if I was in the danger area, I'd take less note as to what the Navy's doing, and more note how closely the shoreline faces the expected wave direction and the local coastal conditions that might magnify the surge of waves.

I'm hopeful that there'll be no damage, and a whole lot of people grumpy that they had sirens and hassles of moving out of the way. Property can be fixed if it does turn out to be damaging waves. The entire exercise is worth it, and really is the first big test of the systems put in after the big Indian Ocean tsunami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. CNNI just reported they they are sending them out now
and the ones in San Diego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Getting the Navy ships out to sea makes sense.
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 04:04 PM by TexasObserver
If the vessels are at sea, the impact of a tsunami is minimal. Navy vessels are at risk in the harbor, because that's where tsunami wave action meets a thin shelf.

Out at sea, the tsunami is largely unseen, under the surface. As the wave reaches the continental shelf, it has nowhere to go but up, and that's what makes it bad for the shoreline. Ships and boats well out of the harbor should be fairly safe. I would think that the further they get from port, the more likely they are to avoid damage. The last thing the Navy needs is ships tethered in the harbor during suddenly rising tides.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I may be wrong, but I seem to recall their intensity forecasts being essentially useless.
It basically boils down to "there is one coming, so get out of the way - just in case". Not that there's anything wrong with that. I wouldn't bet my life or livelihood on a 2 foot surge prediction, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. NB - We are CLOSE to the Full Moon
Waters run high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. *sigh* nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. In case anyone doubts the Moon's impact on tide levels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Tides are not tsunamis. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Ain't nobody saying they are
But if the waters are running high already, as are people's emotions, then it could be some sort of factor.

I doubt sincerely that it's no factor at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. As I recall the US Navy in Hawaii has not always been terribly prescient.
They may never live down that whole Pearl Harbor thing--ya know?

Sorry to sound so flip about it, but it seems to me that maybe it is better to error on the side of caution in cases like this. They put people at risk when they downplay or deadpan this kind of thing. There are families of service people who live and die by this kind of decision making right along with the service men and women.

I was glad to hear that the Navy had, in fact, sent some of the ships out to sea to ride this out. At least THOSE families realize this is potentially serious.



Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. They expected sabotage on the ground in 1941, too. Parked all the aircraft
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 02:33 PM by old mark
in nice, straight lines, close together, so they could be guarded easily. Made fine targets for an attack from the air, as did all the battleships and cruisers tied up alongside the harbor docks.

They don't deserve to live it down lest they repeat it.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. When you say "They don't deserve to live it down" please understand that the workaday Sailor had no
say in where aircraft were parked nor did they make the decision to "nest" the battleships. They stood tall and fought though, even though they faced seemingly insurmountable odds.

2386 Americans died, and for all that, nearly HALF died because of a lucky hit on the USS Arizona. I'd say they acquitted themselves quite admirably that day. Quite admirably indeed.

The US Navy played THE major role in winning the war in the Pacific, just a few short years after nearly being destroyed at Pearl Harbor.

What they DO deserve is the neverending respect they EARNED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Always the armchair admiral on the internet
With that great 20-20 hindsight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. A two foot surge here would inundate certain areas. Not submerge them, but it'd
cover over some areas and cause salt water to get pushed into fresh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. they are sending out the ships now....per m$nbc..david shuster reporting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I was just going to post that
CNN has given us a fair amount of misinformation today. Good to hear and clearly they're expecting waves bigger than two feet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wave height varies, sending ships out now
Just heard on CNN so it could be utter bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. According to CNN they are scrambling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC