Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Despite Harsh Criticism Of Torture Memos Report, Holder Has 'Utmost Confidence' In DOJ Ethics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 07:46 PM
Original message
Despite Harsh Criticism Of Torture Memos Report, Holder Has 'Utmost Confidence' In DOJ Ethics
Source: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/holder_has_utmost_confidence_in_division_that_doj.

Despite Harsh Criticism Of Torture Memos Report, Holder Has 'Utmost Confidence' In DOJ Ethics OfficeJustin Elliott | February 24, 2010, 6:55PM
Attorney General Eric Holder has "the utmost confidence" in the Justice Department's ethics office, despite the fact that it was recently overruled by a top Holder aide in its most high-profile case in years, a DOJ spokeswoman tells TPMmuckraker.

The 290-page torture memo report produced by the Office of Professional Responsibility, which is tasked with investigating misconduct by DOJ attorneys, found that Bush-era attorneys John Yoo and Jay Bybee had committed professional misconduct in writing the legal opinions that authorized torture.

But released with the OPR report Friday was a scathing memo from Associate Deputy AG David Margolis, the top career attorney at the department, that explicitly overruled OPR's finding of misconduct. Margolis barred OPR from referring the matter to state bar disciplinary authorities where Yoo and Bybee are licensed.

Margolis took a dim view of OPR's handling of the case, including the office's initial plan, blocked by then-attorney general Michael Mukasey, to release its report without giving Yoo and Bybee a chance to respond. Margolis accused OPR of shifting its reasoning over the course of two drafts and one final report. His memo thinly veils his scorn toward OPR's approach to the legal issues at hand.

More at.....
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/holder_has_utmost_confidence_in_division_that_doj.php?ref=fpblg

No link yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. The fix is in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Has there been any kind of purge at DOJ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. So confident, he's ignoring their recommendations and let an underling publicly trash them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Awhile ago, Jonathan Turley remarked it would take decades to clean
up the DOJ...I believe he is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. At this pace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. The likes of this hardly inspire the utmost confidence in the DOJ
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. He may not need to get rid
of the Bush Wrecking Crew, just get them to behave. Remember, they're repubs. They're basically cowards. They'll do as they are told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Confirming yet again why I have no confidence in Holder
Edited on Wed Feb-24-10 09:27 PM by depakid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. And how much confidence should we have in Holder . . . ???
Edited on Wed Feb-24-10 10:00 PM by defendandprotect
I have little given what I've seen so far --

And if ever there was a need for special attention and restoration it was within

the DOJ --


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. But I have no confidence in Holder. What is he made of? Straw?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I am pretty sure he has candy inside.
He is a human shield for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. "We don't want to criminalize policy differences
that may exist between the outgoing administration" and the incoming Obama administration. -Eric Holder, January 15, 2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Obama is protecting himself from prosecution when he exits.
Won't be surprised even a bit if the next President is a Republican and goes after Obama for any number of war crimes. He might use the excuse Bush and Cheney did it, but I don't think it will hold up. The thugs will be relentless. That's just my gut take, who knows, I don't claim to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC