Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Lieberman to Take Lead on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:22 PM
Original message
Joe Lieberman to Take Lead on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in Senate
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2010/02/22/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry6231571.shtml

Yeah, that Joe Lieberman...

Connecticut Independent Senator Joe Lieberman will be the chief sponsor of Senate legislation to repeal the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy that bars openly gay men and women from serving in the military.

"I will be proud to be a sponsor of the important effort to enable patriotic gay Americans to defend our national security and our founding values of freedom and opportunity," he said in a statement Monday in which he noted his longtime opposition to the policy.

"To exclude one group of Americans from serving in the armed forces is contrary to our fundamental principles as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and weakens our defenses by denying our military the service of a large group of Americans who can help our cause," said Lieberman, who has angered liberals with his resistance to Democratic orthodoxy on issues like health care reform.

The New York Daily News, which first broke the news, interviewed the Connecticut senator about his opposition to the policy, which was crafted under President Bill Clinton in 1993 following a divisive battle over gays in the military.

"My own experience as a member of the Armed Services Committee, visiting our troops on bases here in this country and abroad, particularly in war zones, the most remarkable quality you'll find is unit cohesion," the former Democrat said. "What matters is not the gender of the other person in your unit or the color or the religion or in this case the sexual orientation. It's whether that person is a good soldier you can depend on."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Thought He Was Referring to Party Affiliation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You could ask Lieberman what his party affiliation is, but you would
never get the same answer twice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even a broken clock is right twice a day
I'm glad to see him doing the right thing but he is still an ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Joe is on the right at all times of day... nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do I get the funny feeling he will sabotage the effort??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Experience--Lots and Lots of It
Although I am puzzled as to how he could make the situation any worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Loop holes
The problem with this repeal is that there are alot of potential loop holes to leave behind. Many service people have effectively and functionally been lying about these relationships. If they don't give them some form of "amnesty" it could be a continuing witch hunt. Furthermore, just look at how women get treated and you'll see some pattern. There will be "restrictions" placed upon them that will hamper their careers. Inability to serve in certain foreign postings which makes it hard to earn the "points" necessary to get promotions. New definitions of "harrassment" which will make them more likely to get accused/convicted.

This administration, and Lieberman as well, have squandered alot of trust on the part of the base, and there's no reason to believe that DADT will be any different. If Obama can say with a straight face that he never campaigned on the public option, imagine what he can say about DADT. Then imagine what Lieberman can say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC