Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone explain why people are upset Obama wont put Nuclear waste on a Fault Line?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 06:17 AM
Original message
Can someone explain why people are upset Obama wont put Nuclear waste on a Fault Line?
I'm just finding out about people being pissed over him cutting funding for Yucca Mountain. His reasoning seems pretty good. It's built on a damn fault line. THat can't be safe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would imagine it's because.....
...no one wants the waste in their backyard. Which is the inherent problem in using nuclear material as a energy source. No one wants the waste after the fuel rods are depleted because their toxicity lasts a long time. So it's a NIMBY reaction.

- And it's one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browns_Ferry_Nuclear_Power_Plant">I can relate to, particularly when there are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_energy">alternatives we haven't even begun to tap nor develop yet to their fullest potential....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But on a fault line? That's crazy. Who authorized it to be built in the first place?
More research should have been done before they wasted money. Had to be Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You got it. Bush siged it into law in 2002.
As for the seismic activity, I believe Nevada ranks at the top at third in seismic activity compared to other states. But the DOE approved it by claiming that any earthquakes there wouldn't have any deleterious effects on the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste site in part because it'd be located deep under ground and inside a mountain and because "tectonic deformation rates are too slow." There's a lot of info to be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yucca_Mountain">Wiki on the subject.

And further, the DOE has no credibility as far as I'm concerned. Not after Three Mile Island and Browns Ferry, and more recently, http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20100215/NEWS02/100214034/Blowing-the-whistle-on-Vermont-Yankee">Vermont Yankee.

- And as with the FDA, the DOE is little more than revolving door for careerists who first work for the government, and then later for the same energy companies they used to regulate as they get close to retirement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. There is a fault line in southern Illinois, also!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep, the New Madrid Fault.
Edited on Fri Feb-19-10 07:03 AM by DeSwiss
I've felt earthquakes and tremors from that one before. And geologists are saying that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Madrid_Seismic_Zone">New Madrid its over due.

- The last time it struck with a big one, it is said that it reversed the flow of the Mississippi River. That's one I hope I don't feel.....


On edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC