Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Goes Nuclear

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:34 AM
Original message
Obama Goes Nuclear
Edited on Thu Feb-18-10 11:45 AM by laststeamtrain
Source: MSNBC / Motley Fool

Obama Goes Nuclear
The first new U.S. nuke in decades lands a key government guarantee.
By Toby Shute
Motley Fool
updated 12:01 a.m. PT, Thurs., Feb. 18, 2010

<snip>

On Tuesday, President Obama announced a conditional $8.3 billion loan guarantee for the first new nuclear power plant in 27 years. If finalized, this would cover 70% of Southern's (NYSE: SO) share of the total project, which aims to complete two units at Plant Vogtle in Burke, Georgia in 2016 and 2017, respectively.

This development has been years in the making. In 2006, Southern applied for an early site permit for the two new units, which was granted last year. In 2008, the firm filed for a construction and operating license, and soon thereafter, Toshiba and Shaw Group (NYSE: SHAW) got the order for two 1,100-megawatt Westinghouse AP1000 reactors. Shaw is both a minority owner of Westinghouse, and the EPC (engineering, procurement, and construction) contractor for the project. Last year, and notably before the project had its early site permit in hand, Southern issued to Shaw a full notice to proceed on the project.

Southern's operating license is not expected to be granted before 2011. If it seems like the company has jumped the gun with any of these steps, that's because it has to if it wants to get this plant built in any reasonable timeframe. The paperwork just takes that long to process.

<snip>

Critics point out that these loan guarantees have a not-insignificant chance of sticking taxpayers with billions of dollars of losses. Next to shenanigans like the uncapped Treasury backstop of Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), this barely registers on my outrage-o-meter.

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35458940/ns/business-motley_fool/



I wonder what Van Jones is doing?

HELLO EVERYBODY. I JUST ARRIVED FROM LBN. I HOPE YOU'RE HAVING A GREAT DAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Had my hopes up there with the title. I was hoping it related to Senate fillibuster rules! n/t
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Those opposing nuclear energy are in the way of climate change reversal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
Gee, are you on the nuclear industry payroll? That crap is poison and cannot be contained and we have NO way of disposing of it.

Before you spout any bullshit about 'nuclear power is the only way to transition to a green economy' let me remind you that that industry has been subsidized to the tune of $300 BILLION dollars by the American taxpayer. If we put that much money into solar power, we'd be energy self-sufficient by now.

Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The Germans went solar 20 years ago...
Where they could have gone nuclear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. They are tirelessly working that crap here
I smell money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. It has to be financed by the government...
No insurance company will cover the potential for accidents...Can you say Chernobyl???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. So Obama supports nuclear power for the US and opposes it for Iran! Is that how the Islamic world
will interpret his action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Great point!!
If nuclear had been eliminated years ago, the situation in Iran wouldn't be, or at least not in the same way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. I just saw this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. $70,000,000 from Exelon . . . ???
Edited on Thu Feb-18-10 12:53 PM by defendandprotect
Is that the name of it -- ?

Plus other nuke lobbyists --

From now on, I'm referring to our "democracy" and "America" --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-18-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wait, hold on, Obama! This is not what we meant about the nuclear option!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC