Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Might you vote for a candidate for President of the USA if he/she has never been married?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:42 PM
Original message
Poll question: Might you vote for a candidate for President of the USA if he/she has never been married?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. If he/she is the Democratic candidate, sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Staph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am one of those never-married folks.
I'd like to think that y'all would vote for me!


:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. What on earth does that have to do with a qualification for being president?
What the hell? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Unfortunately, you'd be quite shocked at the numbers of
millions who actually DO consider marital status, or lack thereof, to be an important qualification. You'd be surprised at how much those who are single and those who've never been married are looked upon askance by society in general and are discriminated against in many areas of life, socially, economically, legally, etc., etc. (there are hundreds of tangible and intangible benefits enjoyed by married couples, from tax and social security laws and policies, to employment policies, etc., etc.). And it gets worse the older you get. It's a lot better to be in your twenties and never married than to be 40 and up and never married. I was nearly 43 before I married a couple years ago, so I know of what I speak first-hand. Even my father treated me quite differently the very day after my wedding, which royally pissed me off. It was like he didn't consider me a "true adult" until I'd married. And the older you get, the more suspiciously you're regarded if you're single or never-married, the whole "there must be something wrong with you" type of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh, god. That IS terrible. And I am shocked. It's pure bigotry, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Of course it is, but it's certainly nothing new.
Check out the website of the American Association of Single Persons, www.unmarriedamerica.com, for some real eye-openers. Especially regarding legal discrimination, tax and social security policy discrimination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. We already had at least one unmarried PM
Ted Heath. I wouldn't have voted for him, even if I'd been old enough, as he was a (very moderate) Tory- but we could have had much worse, and indeed did when Maggie Thatcher replaced him as Tory leader.

I am not interested in a politician's sexuality or personal life; I am interested in their policies and competence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. The last time that happened the Union fell apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Actually, the last time it happened, THIS man was elected
in 1884


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. This question came up years ago when Jerry Brown was running for President
We have had widowed Presidents in our history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Of course; actually, I'd prefer an unmarried President
as long as it's a Democratic President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think the more interesting question would be:
Would you vote for a candadite that is not Christian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'd Be Delighted To Vote For a Candidate That Is Not a Christian
Edited on Tue Feb-16-10 05:34 PM by Toasterlad
Moreso, a candidate who has the balls to stand up and say that organized religion is nothing but a money-making scheme that preys (pun intended) on the gullible and hopeless would get my vote no matter what his/her position is on almost any other issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. matters not to me.I admire people who can make marriage work, but
I'm not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. An aside: the idea of a 'president' for 300 million people is highly absurd
... and illusory at best. My 2 cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wasn't that a movie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. Enthusiastically!
One possible explanation for Obama's continuation of everything Bush started is that Obama's family may have been threatened.

Someone without spouse or kids would be (relatively) immune to that type of pressure.

I think we ought to make it a requirement that the candidates have no immediate family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC