Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Left-Brained?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Laura902 Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:25 AM
Original message
Left-Brained?
Political Science: The Psychological Differences in the U.S.'s Red-Blue Divide
Psychological research reveals how and why liberals and conservatives differ


Humans are, by nature, tribal and never more so than in politics. In the culture wars we all know the tribal stereotypes of what liberals think of con­servatives: Conservatives are a bunch of Hum­mer-driving, meat-eating, gun-toting, hard-drinking, Bible-thumping, black-and-white-thinking, fist-pounding, shoe-stomping, morally hypocritical blowhards. And what conservatives think of liberals: Liberals are a bunch of hybrid-driving, tofu-eating, tree-hugging, whale-saving, sandal-wearing, bottled-water-drinking, ACLU-supporting, flip-flopping, wishy-washy, namby-pamby bed wetters.

Like many other stereotypes, each of these contains an element of truth that reflects an emphasis on different moral values. Jonathan Haidt, who is a psychologist at the University of Virginia, explains such stereotypes in terms of his Moral Foundations Theory (see www.moralfoundations.org), which he developed “to understand why morality varies so much across cultures yet still shows so many similarities and recurrent themes.” Haidt proposes that the foundations of our sense of right and wrong rest within “five innate and universally available psychological systems” that might be summarized as follows:

1. Harm/care: Evolved mammalian attachment systems mean we can feel the pain of others, giving rise to the virtues of kindness, gentleness and nurturance.

2. Fairness/reciprocity: Evolved reciprocal altruism generates a sense of justice.

3. Ingroup/loyalty: Evolved in-group tribalism leads to patriotism.

4. Authority/respect: Evolved hierarchical social structures translate to respect for authority and tradition.

5. Purity/sanctity: Evolved emotion of disgust related to disease and contamination underlies our sense of bodily purity.

Over the years Haidt and his University of Virginia colleague Jesse Graham have surveyed the moral opinions of more than 110,000 people from dozens of countries and have found this consistent difference: self-reported liberals are high on 1 and 2 (harm/care and fairness/reciprocity) but are low on 3, 4 and 5 (ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect and purity/sanctity), whereas self-reported conservatives are roughly equal on all five dimensions, although they place slightly less emphasis on 1 and 2 than liberals do. (Take the survey yourself at www.yourmorals.org.)

Instead of viewing the left and the right as either inherently correct or wrong, a more scientific approach is to recognize that liberals and conservatives emphasize different moral values. My favorite example of these differences is dramatized in the 1992 film A Few Good Men. In the court­room ending, Jack Nicholson’s conservative marine Colonel Nathan R. Jessup is being cross-examined by Tom Cruise’s liberal navy Lieutenant Daniel Kaffee, who is defending two marines accused of accidentally killing a fellow soldier. Kaffee thinks that Jessup ordered a “code red,” an off-the-books command to rough up a disloyal marine trainee in need of discipline and that matters got tragically out of hand. Kaffee wants individual justice for his clients. Jessup wants freedom and security for the nation even at the cost of individual liberty, as he explains:

“Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns.... You don’t want the truth because deep down, in places you don’t talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending something. You use ’em as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it.”

Personally, I tend more toward the liberal emphasis on individual fairness, justice and liberty, and I worry that overemphasis on group loyalty will trigger our inner xenophobias. But evolutionary psychology reveals just how deep our tribal instincts are and why good fences make good neighbors. And I know that ever since 9/11, I am especially grateful to all the brave soldiers on those walls who have allowed us to sleep under a blanket of freedom.


I know talk about this has been around for sometime now but I found this article particularly interesting and a little more in-depth than others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm fairly positive about 1&2
Neutral on 3 and about -100 on 4. Not too worried about #5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Read "Don't Think of an Elephant" and other works by Prof. George Lakoff....
Edited on Tue Feb-16-10 09:39 AM by ClassWarrior
His position is that people on the left and right have two different, divergent worldviews:

To date, I have found only one pair of models for conservative and liberal worldviews that meets all three adequacy," conditions, a pair that (1) explains why certain stands on issues go together (e.g., gun control goes with social programs goes with pro-choice goes with environmentalism); (2) explains why the puzzles for liberals are not puzzles for conservatives, and conversely; and (3) explains topic choice, word choice, and forms of reasoning in conservative and liberal discourse. Those worldviews center on two opposing models of the family.

http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/467716.html

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hard Wired?
Interesting that you brought that up. Just read in the NY Times an article about liberals and conservatives being born the way they are. “Our Politics May Be All In Our Head” by Nicholas D. Kristof. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/opinion/14kristof.html?scp=3&sq=Nicholas%20Kristoff&st=cse
There is a recent book out, “Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics” by Marc J. Hetherington of Vanderbilt University and Jonathan D. Weiler of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. They started out looking at the correlation between state attitudes toward spanking children and voting patterns. Can you guess who spanks? If we’re born the way we’re born, how do we even start making things appropriate? Putting birth control in the water in red states could be a start, but really!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura902 Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Ya!
like that birth control idea, just kidding ;), that article is where I got the idea this morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Read about Kohlberg's stages of moral development. Repubes are stuck in stage 1 (the stage of 6
year olds) - they see everything black and white, right or wrong. As your thinking evolves you become more of a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. IMO, rethugs are really sociopaths. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Wow, what a literate and thoughtful answer.
Not to mention soooo helpful.

:eyes:

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Are you defending freepers and tea baggers?
If you can't see their sociopathic behavior by now, I wonder why you have been on DU for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. No, I'm trying to defend progressives against knee-jerk third grade thinking. Please see post #2...
Edited on Tue Feb-16-10 01:01 PM by ClassWarrior
...above.

Read "Don't Think of an Elephant" and other works by Prof. George Lakoff....

His position is that people on the left and right have two different, divergent worldviews:

To date, I have found only one pair of models for conservative and liberal worldviews that meets all three adequacy," conditions, a pair that (1) explains why certain stands on issues go together (e.g., gun control goes with social programs goes with pro-choice goes with environmentalism); (2) explains why the puzzles for liberals are not puzzles for conservatives, and conversely; and (3) explains topic choice, word choice, and forms of reasoning in conservative and liberal discourse. Those worldviews center on two opposing models of the family.


http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/467716.html

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Is that a generalization? Based on what?
Since almost half the population identifies as Republican, I'd have to question the accuracy of your statement. Surely, not all of them are sociopaths. Can you, perhaps, show your work in reaching that conclusion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I don't have to prove shit to you. But if you can't see that rethugs have zero compassion,
Edited on Tue Feb-16-10 10:08 AM by earth mom
and want to kill everyone who isn't like them, you have learned squat since you joined DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. All Republicans? Are you sure?
I disagree with Republican positions on virtually everything. But I don't think that all Republicans want to kill everyone who isn't like them. Getting some Republicans to vote with us is a pretty important thing, and we aren't going to get much of that if we call all Republicans sociopaths.

As for proving things to me, you have no such responsibility. You may do as you please. I'm just one DUer. I can't demand anything of anyone, except myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. I agree - there is no right and wrong here
republicans are sociopathic, no judgement attached. sharks aren't right or wrong.

But 3 and 4 are about people who identify strongly with community while 1 and 2 are about people who identify strongly as individuals - and the two mindsets aren't really compatible.

The difference is - they're willing to commit a crime in the name of the greater good against our individual liberty, and I'm willing to commit a crime in the name of individual liberty to keep from having my rights stolen by a bunch of atavistic tribal sociopaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. This article would make a lot more sense if American conservatives actually had consistent values..
Edited on Tue Feb-16-10 10:32 AM by Fumesucker
For instance #4. Authority/respect: Evolved hierarchical social structures translate to respect for authority and tradition.

Conservatives demanded respect for the authority of the president when one of theirs, bushie, was POTUS but utterly and totally disrespect the office as soon as someone they disagree with, Obama, became president.

I could go on in this vein practically forever but I imagine most of you get my point.

Things may be different in other countries but in the USA conservatives basically have no real consistent beliefs.

Edited for speling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC