Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Nation Unearths Massive, Blatant, Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest Among TeeVee Pundits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 03:06 AM
Original message
The Nation Unearths Massive, Blatant, Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest Among TeeVee Pundits
Since 2007 at least seventy-five registered lobbyists, public relations representatives and corporate officials--people paid by companies and trade groups to manage their public image and promote their financial and political interests--have appeared on MSNBC, Fox News, CNN, CNBC and Fox Business Network with no disclosure of the corporate interests that had paid them. Many have been regulars on more than one of the cable networks, turning in dozens--and in some cases hundreds--of appearances.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20100301/jones/single

The Lobbying-Media Complex

By Sebastian Jones

President Obama spent most of December 4 touring Allentown, Pennsylvania, meeting with local workers and discussing the economic crisis. A few hours later, the state's former governor, Tom Ridge, was on MSNBC's Hardball With Chris Matthews, offering up his own recovery plan. There were "modest things" the White House might try, like cutting taxes or opening up credit for small businesses, but the real answer was for the president to "take his green agenda and blow it out of the box." The first step, Ridge explained, was to "create nuclear power plants." Combined with some waste coal and natural gas extraction, you would have an "innovation setter" that would "create jobs, create exports."

As Ridge counseled the administration to "put that package together," he sure seemed like an objective commentator. But what viewers weren't told was that since 2005, Ridge has pocketed $530,659 in executive compensation for serving on the board of Exelon, the nation's largest nuclear power company. As of March 2009, he also held an estimated $248,299 in Exelon stock, according to SEC filings.

Moments earlier, retired general and "NBC Military Analyst" Barry McCaffrey told viewers that the war in Afghanistan would require an additional "three- to ten-year effort" and "a lot of money." Unmentioned was the fact that DynCorp paid McCaffrey $182,309 in 2009 alone. The government had just granted DynCorp a five-year deal worth an estimated $5.9 billion to aid American forces in Afghanistan. The first year is locked in at $644 million, but the additional four options are subject to renewal, contingent on military needs and political realities.

In a single hour, two men with blatant, undisclosed conflicts of interest had appeared on MSNBC. The question is, was this an isolated oversight or business as usual? Evidence points to the latter. In 2003 The Nation exposed McCaffrey's financial ties to military contractors he had promoted on-air on several cable networks; in 2008 David Barstow wrote a Pulitzer Prize-winning series for the New York Times about the Pentagon's use of former military officers--many lobbying or consulting for military contractors--to get their talking points on television in exchange for access to decision-makers; and in 2009 bloggers uncovered how ex-Newsweek writer Richard Wolffe had guest-hosted Countdown With Keith Olbermann while working at a large PR firm specializing in "strategies for managing corporate reputation."

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20100301/jones/single">Whole expose continues here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. suddenly
I like Richard Wolffe a lot less. And I really liked his book, Renegade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rev. Paul Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. So...
does Mr. Wolffe still work for the PR firm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. I believe so.
Keith mentions his affiliation when he is on. But I do notice that he is on less frequently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rev. Paul Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #57
62. I believe it was...
last month that Olbermann had Wolffe on three nights in a row,and there was no mention of Wolffe & the PR firm. It was then that I caught on to the fact that Olbermann was also full of 'shite'...just like the rest of them. I was hoping I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Sorry, but you are full of shit.
When it was discovered Wolfe had the PR ties, Olbermann took him off the air for months. Once Wolfe's role at the PR firm was ironed out Olbermann brought him back on but Wolfe doesn't not comment on the topics he used to, and the company he works for is shown/talked about each time he is on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #47
65. He joined Public Strategies in April 2009. Before that he was with Newsweek. KO apologized
for having Wolffe host his show once he bcame a lobbyist. Here's the comment from wikipedia. Ana Marie COx called KO out on the whole issue.

"In July 2009, Richard Wolffe guest hosted a few episodes of Countdown with Keith Olbermann. He came under fire shortly afterward from columnist Glenn Greenwald and liberal pundit Ana Marie Cox due to his position at Public Strategies as a "paid lobbyist." Greenwald referred to Wolffe's guest-host appearances as "blatantly sleazy," noting that Olbermann regularly criticized Fox News for having lobbyists on their network.<3> Olbermann has since apologized, claiming he was caught "flat-footed" and announcing that Wolffe would no longer appear on Countdown until his activities outside of MSNBC are made clear.<4> On October 1, 2009 Richard Wolffe appeared on Countdown with Keith Olbermann discussing Sarah Palin and her autobiography. He announced the decision to let Wolffe back on the show on his blog at DailyKos, stating, "Firstly, as I said when issues about Richard's other work were first raised in August of this year, he wouldn't appear on the newshour until we straightened them out. I'm confident we've done that now. Among other managers, the broadcast network's very tough practices exec vetted this other job (and as indicated, the work he's done for us), found no interrelation, and believes as I do that the failure was in the area of disclosure. Thus will his appearances be limited to areas that don't overlap with his non-journalistic work. Those that could even seem to present a conflict of interest will also be off-limits. Each of his appearances will mention his private work and viewers will be directed to the web for fuller elucidation of what he does - and doesn't - do there.""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wolffe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
very interesting article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nope, no story here. Nothing newsworthy, no human interest. Drop 'er down the Memory Hole.
Oh, that Liberal Media!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. WOW. rec'd before even reading
bout time this shit is talked about more. F*U*C*K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. K&R
:kick:

there's a reason those people are ALWAYS available for a comment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftrightwingnut Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Good point. What exactly do these people *do* that they can afford to be on TV all the time?
Unless they are paid "analysts", I don't think that they get paid by the networks for their appearances.

:kick: (back)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. GEM$NBC
snip

Then there's MSNBC, the cable network with the most egregious instances of airing guests with conflicts of interest. Only on MSNBC did Todd Boulanger, a Jack Abramoff-connected lobbyist working for Cassidy and Associates, go on a TV rehabilitation tour with no identification of his work, all while he was under investigation for corruption (he pleaded guilty in January 2009). Only on MSNBC was a prime-time program, Countdown, hosted by public relations operative Richard Wolffe and later by a pharmaceutical company consultant, former Governor Howard Dean, with no mention of the outside work either man was engaged in. And MSNBC has yet to introduce DynCorp's Barry McCaffrey as anything but a "military analyst."

end snip


The Barry McCaffrey cover up is stunning, really. I wish they would go after Morning Jerk more in the article. Perhaps there was not enough room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. McCaffrey has experience in this sort of thing.
As Clinton's drug czar, he cut deals to place anti-drug convert propaganda in prime time TV shows. He was a member of the neoconservative Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which alone justifies rejection of anything he has to say about US foreign policy, particularly where our military is concerned.

But there are many other reasons he should be laughed out of the room any time he pretends to offer objective analysis.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/washington/30general.html?_r=1&em=&pagewanted=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
49. Maybe that's his DynCorp title!
Maybe his DynCorp business card that he tacks to the MSNBC bulletin board says "Barry McCaffrey, Military Analyst."

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't know why anyone would be surprised by this.
This has been going on for some time now.
And this is the mechanism by which the Oligarchs bought the government.
There is a revolving door between them all, military, industrial, congressional, Media complex.
And by working together they can control the government and enrich themselves at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. agreed. no surprise.
any anti-status quo political movement must target all these tentacles of the same body of corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. I don't know what it would take to shock me, after living through *'s eight long years. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
56. And it seemed like an eternity n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
51. +1 no shock to me at all
Edited on Sat Feb-13-10 09:49 PM by Blue_Tires
i pretty much shut off the cable news and sunday morning TV news not long after they were drumming up the case for the iraq invasion, and haven't seen it since...by then, it was clear even to me just how blatant the corporate-government backscratching was...

luckily, i re-discovered something that's at least CLOSE to real news with the BBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Me too but I don't have cable at all.
But I have Netflix and I get all the entertainment I need from that...and some things informative too.
the internet provides me news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Exelon, the nation's largest nuclear power company" = backer of Chicago charter schools
& Obama's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Vile and completely unsurprising.
The networks really need to do some research on these people before the put them on the air, and to disclose the pundits' industry ties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. They know full well what they are doing..
... you can bet on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Truth2Tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Support real journalism and subscribe
to the Nation. No out side corporate support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thank God for the Nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. k and r
sheesh - corporate media skankitude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Thank you, Nation. Well worth shouting about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. i'll say it til i'm blue in the face....the media is our enemy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Commonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. I can't believe anybody watches that crap in the first place.
I mean seriously, don't people have better things to do than to watch TV?
Its entire purpose and reason for existing is to scramble your brains.
Does anyone actually believe anything that anyone on TV has ever said?
That goes for those little heroes everybody is always talking about around here, Keith and Rachel.
They are ALL full of shit and part of the game.
It's nothing but a "vast wasteland" and should be relegated to the dustbin of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. K&R - For The Nation
As in the magazine. Until The Nation is MSM, our nation is just being hosed by the regular media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. Interesting. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Recomm
A pissed off recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. Great analysis. MSNBC is all about business. Amazing how they fooled so many Dems
in 2007 and 2008. Had people been paying attention, the corporate bias of our current administration would not come as so much of a surprise.

For folks that did not read them at the time, check out my journal entries about MSNBC's election coverage. GE is BIG business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. the sole purpose of the media is to promote the status quo and deliver the undiluted BRAND USA
marketing message.

it serves no other purpose. the media is a propaganda organ of the elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
28. There are no "real" journalists anymore
Journalism used to be a single occupation..a rather low-paid one, at that.

But then, people could live on lower incomes until the 80's, and journalists who loved ferreting out juicy stories, could make a living doing what they loved to do. Journalism was a "blue-collar" profession.

The "Big-3" had their long-term anchors, whose integrity was never impugned, and there was not internet or cable venue to compete.

People wrote books and had to push them without the aid of their pal's teevee show..

Experts were just that..experts.. they were not multi-faceted, self-corporations who lobbied on behalf of benefactors.

Now ANYONE who has a point of view and some lobbyist/think-tank money behind them can get airtime pretty much any time they want. (unless they are truly liberal).

The convergence of opinion & fact ...on a 24-7 basis has skewed things so much, we may never again actually have real-news ever again. The choice of which stories to cover even skews the news.. Think back to how many investigative stores about GE adventures have you seen on MSNBC or NBC...or how many "bad" stories you will ever hear about DisneyCorp on ABC...or about Time, or Warner or AOL, on CBS or CNN (they have a connection)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. lawsuits?
possible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
30. MSNBC is a lot like the democratic party

They seem more well intentioned than the other side, but in the end they are all corporate shills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. Corruption here....
...corruption there, corruption, corruption, everywhere. I'm glad somebody is finally writing about it.

- I'm sure that "change I can believe in" is just around the corner......

K&R

"We'll be back with "mounds of news" after a word from our evil sponsors."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
64. LOVE your photo of FAUXNOISE anchorcritters!!!
and Ella Wilcox Wheeler has been a poet that I have quoted on occasion.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=7727483#7730181



"Solitude"
"Laugh, and the world laughs with you;
"Weep, and you weep alone."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. Be cool to see a calculation of the rate at which these brainwashers for our Economic Royalty appear
on our tvs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
33. This ought to be a contender for most recommended post here ever
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. Didn't "Network" teach you guys anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanSocDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Scary, isn't it...


Yesterdays 'paranoid fantasy' is todays reality.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. Pretty prescient, huh. Paddy Chayefsky was a genius...
Edited on Sat Feb-13-10 08:02 PM by BrklynLiberal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paddy_Chayefsky

This is merely his work in film:

Chayefsky had a unique clause in his Marty contract that stated only he could write the screenplay, and the success of the live TV drama starring Rod Steiger led to a film two years later with Ernest Borgnine in the title role. The movie won the Academy Award for Best Picture, Borgnine won for Best Actor, and Chayefsky received an Academy Award for his screenplay.

After the success of Marty, he focused on films, scripting The Goddess, which starred Kim Stanley (for which he received an Oscar nomination) and The Bachelor Party. In the 1960s his credits included The Americanization of Emily, which featured James Garner, Julie Andrews, Melvyn Douglas and James Coburn; and Paint Your Wagon, a screen vehicle for Lee Marvin. He won two more Oscars for The Hospital (1971) which starred George C. Scott and Diana Rigg, and Network (1976), which featured Faye Dunaway, William Holden, Peter Finch (who won the Oscar for "Best Actor in a Leading Role") and Robert Duvall among other cast members. For both of these films Chayefsky received Golden Globe awards. He was awarded an Oscar for Network in the "Best Original Screenplay" category.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
58. It just occured to me that the teabaggers watched the "mad as hell" part
but didn't stick around for this part of the movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. The Nation rocks.
Edited on Sat Feb-13-10 07:29 PM by hay rick
The Nation still does reporting. Pity that's the exception and not the rule. Buried in the middle of the article was a reference to Howard Dean being a "pharmaceutical company consultant." The main point of the article was that this kind of potential conflict-of-interest should be made known to viewers and very often is not. Anybody know anything about Dr. Dean's consulting gig? First I've heard about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
39. DUH. The fools that swallow up cable "news" on either side are the dummies here
the whole thing is rigged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Do you mean to imply that Network News is any better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Of course not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #41
54. Turn it ALL off . . . !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. In case there was still ANY doubt at all that we are living in a Corporatocracy....
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. Our "free market" at work (thank you, Mr. President). Just like those retired generals and
admirals who get hired at three and four times their former salary to provide their "expertise" to private industry.

Excellent post. Rec.

Thank you, truth2tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
44. The answer to this is to STOP watching the corporate media whores.
Stop letting them fill your head with propaganda DU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanlassie Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
48. Isn't Katrina vanden Heuvel a regular on Countdown?
Just saying, She is editor of The Nation- I know this because I watch Countdown. So her presence there is a form of advertising for her magazine. But then again, there is disclosure of this fact each time she is introduced.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. Not comparable to what's being discussed . . . at all -- !!
Edited on Sat Feb-13-10 09:53 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. We're overloaded with corruption -- let's please uninvent the dollar bill???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
52. Basically, in between the commercials, what you're getting is more COMMERCIALS!!
Turn off the TVs, folks --

Put 'em in the closet!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. That's why it's called commercial television.
Duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tango-tee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
60. Excellent post, truth2tell,
and a disgusted rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
61. Conflicts of interest?
Are you kidding? They let Oliver North get on the TV and people aren't throwing rocks at him.
Dick Cheney is allowed to speak on news shows and people take him seriously.
Beck shills non-stop for gold companies that pay him to do it.
We're so far beyond conflicts of interest I'm not sure they even register for most people anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
63. I'm so sorry that I'm too late to recommend this post!!
Corporate corruption has completely infiltrated our society and I think it's about to get a helluva lot worse with the recent SCOTUS decision.

Exposing it alone isn't enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-17-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
67. How did I miss this thread before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC