Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain's role in the torture of terror suspects. (Binyam Mohamed & others)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 09:16 PM
Original message
Britain's role in the torture of terror suspects. (Binyam Mohamed & others)
Britain's role in the torture of terror suspects: the Guardian investigation



1 / 7

29 April 2008: The Guardian reports on the first allegations that several British nationals have been tortured in Pakistan before being prosecuted or subjected to a control order in the UK. Their accounts appear to fit a pattern

M15 accused of colluding in torture of terrorist suspects

Below each picture is a link to the original article.


The truth about torture Britain's catalogue of shame, by Ian Cobain



Binyam Mohamed: read the secret torture evidence

Binyam Mohamed: a shameful cover-up by Clive Stafford Smith


Binyam Mohamed: the government lawyer's letter to the court of appeal, annotated by Ian Cobain




A lot of links but well worth reading.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. America's role in Binyam Mohamed's torture & extraordinary rendition
Edited on Wed Feb-10-10 10:20 PM by Solly Mack
ACLU Sues Boeing Subsidiary for Participation in CIA Kidnapping and Torture Flights

"The American Civil Liberties Union today filed a federal lawsuit against Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., a subsidiary of Boeing Company, on behalf of three victims of the United States government's unlawful "extraordinary rendition" program. The lawsuit charges that Jeppesen knowingly provided direct flight services to the CIA that enabled the clandestine transportation of Binyam Mohamed, Abou Elkassim Britel and Ahmed Agiza to secret overseas locations where they were subjected to torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

"American corporations should not be profiting from a CIA rendition program that is unlawful and contrary to core American values," said Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director of the ACLU. "Corporations that choose to participate in such activity can and should be held legally accountable."

US legal rulings & other info on the case


Binyam Mohamed launches legal fight to stop US destroying torture images


"In a sworn statement seen by the Guardian, Mohamed has appealed to the federal district court in Washington not to destroy the photograph, which neither he nor his lawyers have a copy of, and which is classified under US law.

The US government considered the case closed once Mohamed was released and returned to Britain in February. The photograph will be destroyed within 30 days of his case being dismissed by the American courts – a decision on which is due to be taken by a judge imminently, Clive Stafford Smith, Mohamed's British lawyer and director of Reprieve, the legal charity, said today .

Under US law, evidence relating to dismissed cases must be automatically destroyed. The only way to preserve the photograph is to have it accepted as a court document."


Human Cargo: Binyam Mohamed and the Rendition Frequent Flyer Programme

BINYAM MOHAMED’S FIRST U.S. RENDITION: PAKISTAN TO THE TORTURE CHAMBER IN MOROCCO

On or around 21 July 2002 Binyam reports being taken to a military airport in Islamabad, with two others also apparently slated for rendition. After around two hours of waiting, Binyam was turned over to American personnel. Binyam describes a routine consistently recounted by numerous victims, and recorded by NGOs, government inquiries and other witnesses around the world, that has come to be known as the modus operandi of US renditions. Binyam recalls that his kidnappers were dressed in black, with masks, wearing what looked like Timberland boots. They stripped him naked, took photos, put fingers up his anus and dressed him in a tracksuit. Binyam was then shackled, with ear-mufflers, blindfolded, and put into a plane. He was tied to the seat for the roughly 8-10 hour flight, and arrived on 22 July 2002, in a place he later learnt was Morocco.


N379P

According to official Eurocontrol flight data, at twenty-five minutes to six in the evening of 21 July 2002, Gulfstream V N379P left Islamabad, arriving in Rabat at eighteen minutes to four in the morning. Gulfstream V N379P is a plane that was then owned by a CIA front company called Premier Executive Transport, and is according to Amnesty International the plane “most frequently associated with known cases of rendition.”

N379P has been dubbed “the torture taxi” by journalists and plane spotters around the world. The distance from Islamabad to Rabat is 7,031 km (4,369 miles). N379P had an average range of 5,800 nautical miles, cruising at between 459 and 585 knots. At 470 knots, then, the flight from Islamabad to Rabat would take just over 8 hours, which is consistent with Binyam’s estimate that the flight took 8-10 hours.


More back story on the US/Torture/CIA/Extraordinary Rendition/Binyam Mohamed.


You can also do a search on DU. Several of us have been keeping up with his story.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Edited on Wed Feb-10-10 10:20 PM by spanone
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks, spanone
Should be interesting to see what the new info will yield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. 2-11-10 Torture is a crime, not a state secret
Torture is a crime, not a state secret


First, the seven-paragraph summary details that the interrogation practices endured by Mohamed while in American custody during 2002 constituted "at the very least cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment". It reveals nothing besides the fact the US and its proxies resorted to barbarous methods to extract information from captives they believed were al-Qaida terrorists.

Second, far more damning information on Mohamed's torture was published last year by a US court. In November 2009, US District Judge Gladys Kessler granted the habeus corpus petition of Gitmo detainee Farhi Saeed Bin Mohammed – another indicator of the cross-Atlantic return of the rule of law. The prisoner had been held indefinitely without charge at Guantánamo Bay since 2002, based partly on Mohamed's confessions to US interrogators. There was one problem, however: US interrogators coerced Mohamed's allegations against Mohammed through torture. "The government does not challenge Petitioner's evidence of Binyam Mohamed's abuse," Kessler wrote in her decision. It's important to note that the "abuse" Mohamed says he endured during his detention included having his genitals slashed by a razor.

In short order, the information the British court ordered released yesterday was neither intelligence nor secret. What it did show, however, was what we already knew. The US had systematically tortured detainees it deemed terrorists without due process, and British intelligence was complicit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Thanks for all these links!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC