Is the economy the reason that Obama is reluctant to stop the wars?
Will the economy be negatively impacted if Obama brings the troops home? I'm trying to find a rationale for his hesitation in stopping the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
so it would behoove him to end both occupations. A lot of bought and paid for Corporate politicians want to keep these 2 occupations going, because it is all about MONEY. and that money ends up in their pockets. He listens to them, not us.
it may in the short run but not in the long run. It would free up lots of funds. The war would have to be fought in a totally different way, with great information gathering and checks at the borders , changes in all kinds of polices. This would be hard to push for and the government may not be ready on this front. the middle independents favor the war thing and that tilts the balance.
7. So all he would have to do (in principle) is end the wars and
put the money into rebuilding America. Demob the military & give them jobs building infrastructure, paying them the same wages they would have gotten in Godforsakistan.
He is reluctant because he is afraid he will allow a rapid return of both Al Queada and the Taliban to their former places. I think there is a huge span between doing what we are doing, and doing nothing, that doesn't involve having 100K+ troops deployed. But that's the primary advice he's being given.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.