Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The FCC Considers Ramping Up Crusade Against “Robo Callers”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:11 PM
Original message
The FCC Considers Ramping Up Crusade Against “Robo Callers”
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) already has regulations concerning the use of automated (predictive) dialers to cellular phone numbers. The FCC has proposed several new regulations that would curtail the use of automated pre-recorded message dialers and automated dialing systems.
If adopted, the changes to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act would limit the use of prerecorded calls and automatic telephone dialing systems.

The stricter guidelines proposed by the FCC on Jan. 20 have debt-collection companies in an uproar. Right now, non-sellers can make “autodialed” or prerecorded calls to wireless numbers. The ARM or “account receivable management” professionals claim they had consumers’ “prior express consent” for those calls when the customer provided a cell phone number on a credit application.

Debt collectors have expressed outrage about the plan on insider Web sites. A few suggested suing debtors as a way to get even for the new restrictions. Some blamed voting in liberal Democrats when Republicans have been “traditionally better for the ARM (Accounts Receivable Management) industry.” ~ source Delco Times


If adopted debt collectors are suggesting they will sue consumers in retribution if the new guidelines are approved, even though it is the US Government taking the action.

This is exactly why I (Allen Harkleroad) wrote the book, “Stick it to Sue Happy Debt Collectors”. I say let them sue and then the consumer can beat them in court. It is a sad fact that only one out of ten consumers respond to a debt lawsuit, and 90 percent (or more) the debt collector had not physical proof that a debt is owed. It is time for the bad lawsuits to go away, consumers must fight for their rights.

http://www.statesboro.biz/News/436/The-FCC-Considers-Ramping-Up-Crusade-Against-Robo-Callers.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. In CA there's virtually a summary judgement against junk faxers
My BIL lawyer makes a very good living shutting them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Just thinking of that brightens my day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. We need to get laws implemented for Robo-calls from politicians.
I don't need 3-4 per day during election season from people I know i'm voting against.

The trick about robo-calls is that it's impossible to ever get taken off of their calling list. At least is a debt collector calls my number for someone who use to have my number, I can tell them, "Look, I just got this phone number a week ago. My name is ___ _____ and I have no idea who the person is you're looking for. Don't call again or I'll report you to the attorney general." You can't do that with a robo-call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Reminds me of the time I kept getting robocall voice mail messages on my cell phone.
It was a collection agency acting on behalf of GMAC. The only way to get them to stop was, you have to call them. And push buttons galore to get through. And wait. I had to enter my account number. I didn't have one. At length I figured out a way to get through to a human being. Someone else had furnished my cell phone number, apparently at random, when they filled out a credit application with GMAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. SC rules Robo-callers people on 5-4 judgement.
Edited on Mon Feb-08-10 01:45 PM by Gold Metal Flake

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC