Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We need a commander-in-chief, not a law professor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
instantkarma Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:15 AM
Original message
We need a commander-in-chief, not a law professor
Edited on Mon Feb-08-10 11:56 AM by instantkarma
I heard Sarah Palin say this in her speech (for which the zombies ferociously applauded)

In doing so, she threw the following Republicans under the bus and spun her tires on their graves:

These were all lawyers who became Republican presidents.

Lincoln
Hayes
Garfield
Arthur
McKinley
Taft
Coolidge
Nixon
Ford

While some of these are undoubtedly of questionable performance as they are remembered historically, the one that immediately jumped to mind when I heard her say this is, of course, Lincoln. That I've yet to see anyone else bring this up is almost as surprising as actually hearing her say it. So I thought I would. I just can't get over what a stupid, unaware, not-see statement that is.

She's such an idiot.

Please forgive me for the addition of yet another thread about the queen of slugs and thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL, Woodrow Wilson was an adjunct law professor at New York Law School.
Edited on Mon Feb-08-10 11:22 AM by no_hypocrisy
And he was a "war president".

How'd that work out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
instantkarma Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Woodrow Wilson was a democrat.
I'm only pointing out the republicans. Particularly Lincoln.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. At that point in history, today's republicans might have been democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Teddy Roosevelt, who ran against Wilson in 1912 as a Progressive (Bull Moose Party) ..
Teddy Roosevelt, who was a Republican when he served as US President (1901-1909), was far more of a progressive populist as a Republican than many of the Democrats we have today. In the field of three running for President in 1912 (Woodrow Wilson - Democrat, William Howard Taft - Republican, and Teddy Roosevelt - Bull Moose (Progressive)), Roosevelt looked far more like the near-ideal Democrat by today's standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
instantkarma Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I agree
However, the exodus in the fifties and sixties over a catholic president and civil rights notwithstanding, Wilson was a democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. He is an awsome leader. I feel bad for the repubs they way he man-handles them.
It is the fact that she is so very wrong that makes her sound so stupid again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. she knows we really need a housewife/failed mayor/failed governor/failed candidate to run the u.s.
Edited on Mon Feb-08-10 11:44 AM by spanone
cause as bu$h* taught us, law is really a joke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Just to again try to set the record straight...
Obama was not a Law Professor, he was a Lecturer. Tremendous difference between the two positions. Constitutional expert? I sorta doubt that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-08-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Have you taken university courses?
I'm wondering if you have because lecturing is what professors do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC