Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The cost of the Belo Monte Dam in Brazil.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:25 AM
Original message
The cost of the Belo Monte Dam in Brazil.
Everyone knows that finding a renewable source of energy is crucial to wean the world off fossil fuels and cut carbon emissions, but what are we willing to sacrifice for clean energy?

In Brazil, the government has given the green light for the construction of a massive hydroelectric dam that will be able to generate enough energy for over 23 million homes. However, its creation will see the flooding of huge portions of the Amazon basin, displacing indigenous tribes and putting 500 sq km of rain-forest underwater. The creation of the Belo Monte Dam is expected to begin in 2015 and is rumoured to cost around $17 billion. Set to be situated on the Xingu River, a tributary of the Amazon in the northern state of Para it has been abandoned several times, noticeably in the early 90s due to its controversial nature and widespread global protests.

Brazil's environment minister Carlos Minc has stated that those who win the bidding process to building contract and operate Belo Monte will have to pay around $800 million to protect the environment and meet 40 other conditions.

"There is not going to be an environmental disaster," he told Brazilian television. He also addressed accusations that local Indians would be forced from their lands saying, "Not a single Indian will be displaced. They will be indirectly affected, but they will not have to leave indigenous lands."
<snip>
http://www.euinfrastructure.com/news/belo-monte-dam/

And as the silt builds up..................


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
Dickheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Grits you are usually less prone to hype. So, I'm a little disappointed
Edited on Sun Feb-07-10 06:47 AM by thunder rising
The advertisement states relocation, but the official denies it and there is no supporting evidence for either statement.

250^(1/2) = 15 sq km (app)
500^(1/2) = 22 sq km (app)

Now that is in km so keep that in mind. Next, although it represents approx 30% increase in the flood area, I have to imagine that it's still within the flood range.

I don't see the problem here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm hyping to wake up, but
I don't believe any official statement. The words 'official statement' are suspect IMHO. The truth is somewhere in the middle probably. It will still be an eco-mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Got that, imagine me on a calculator at 6am, that's dangerous. Anymore I think of the oil lobby
and who might be behind killing the project. We are on the same page, but my suspicion is more centered on the corporations that are already trying to topple the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. True dat! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC