Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL. Ms. Palin invokes Ronald Reagan, throws Republican Party under the bus.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:12 PM
Original message
LOL. Ms. Palin invokes Ronald Reagan, throws Republican Party under the bus.
Edited on Sat Feb-06-10 10:36 PM by pinto
Run Palin, Run!

Oh, and a shout out to Todd. Hey Dude.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. And didn't Nancy vote for Obama?
Yes, I believe most of the family threw Palin under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did she really?
Way to go, Sarah... bite the hand that feeds you. Tsk, tsk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Basically, yeah. After repeated mentions of Reagan in her speech, her (scripted) Q & A
Edited on Sat Feb-06-10 10:37 PM by pinto
basically held up unaffiliated Independents as role models for Teabaggers. I'd guess that many Republicans, Sen. McCain among them, were throwing stuff at their TV's. Run Palin, run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is CNN covering this foolishness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why is ANYBODY covering it?
Turned on the TV thinking that Ed Schultz might have some scathing comments, but he must be under orders from management to take it easy on her.

They are definitely trying to pump her up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Would they cover a Progresive conference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Saturday night is comedy night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:23 PM
Original message
Maybe they just wanted to show the idiocy of this group. I hope that is so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. This could be big news. This might be the beginning of a huge
power struggle between the right and ultra right. I think Sarah either wants to take over the GOP, or start a third party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KonaKane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. We used to throw raves bigger than that.
And not a second of TV coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Really, I am sick of the relevance given to these fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzNick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wasn't Reagan a LIBERAL in their book?
Reagan managed to have a lot of union workers and gays to vote for him because he was actually a lot more liberal than Palin and the current GOP is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Reagan was the worst turncoat for unions in the history of the office Not exactly sure how he's seen
in the Republican iconography. Just thought Palin's performance was ironic. She went out of her way to cloak herself in things Reagan, then immediately, disjointedly discounted it all. Pretty funny, in a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzNick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Palin would have backed the Briggs initiative nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC