Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One in four Americans is employed to guard the wealth of the rich

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 02:16 AM
Original message
One in four Americans is employed to guard the wealth of the rich
Santa Fe Institute economist: one in four Americans is employed to guard the wealth of the rich

By Cory Doctorow at 10:45 PM February 5, 2010

Here's a fascinating profile on radical Santa Fe Institute economist Samuel Bowles, an empiricist who says his research doesn't support the Chicago School efficient marketplace hypothesis. Instead, Bowles argues that the wealth inequality created by strict market economics creates inefficiencies because society has to devote so much effort to stopping the poor from expropriating the rich. He calls this "guard labor" and says that one in four Americans is employed to in the sector -- labor that could otherwise be used to increase the nation's wealth and progress.

The greater the inequalities in a society, the more guard labor it requires, Bowles finds. This holds true among US states, with relatively unequal states like New Mexico employing a greater share of guard labor than relatively egalitarian states like Wisconsin.

The problem, Bowles argues, is that too much guard labor sustains "illegitimate inequalities," creating a drag on the economy. All of the people in guard labor jobs could be doing something more productive with their time--perhaps starting their own businesses or helping to reduce the US trade deficit with China.

Guard labor supports what one might call the beat-down economy. Community Action's Porter sees it all the time.

"We have based almost everything we have done on the idea that we always need a part of our workforce that is marginalized--that we can call this group into action at any time, pay them nothing and they will do anything that needs to be done," she says.

More discouraging, perhaps, is the statistical fact that a person born into this workforce has little chance of rising beyond it.

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/05/santa-fe-institute-e.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is an especially good article. I have been a fan of this guy for some time.
It's well worth seeking out his original papers, which are highly readable and very insightful - excellent economist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here's a link...
The original article on him in the Santa Fe Reporter is excellent

http://sfreporter.com/stories/born_poor/5339/all/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I just realized who you are.
I downloaded some patches of yours for my Virus (that I haven't gotten around to loading...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Typically these jobs pay shit wages.
Kind of a double whammy - you are helping protect the wealthy from the fruits of their exploitation, while being exploited at the same time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. And the other 3/4ths are paid to produce that wealth?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. So THERE's where my revolution went!
I knew I misplaced it somewhere!

Fascinating.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC