Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rude Pundit - Note to John McCain: Gay Soldiers Don't Want to Rape Your Ass

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 12:52 PM
Original message
The Rude Pundit - Note to John McCain: Gay Soldiers Don't Want to Rape Your Ass
Underneath the glowing sheen of rationality given to the most despicable of beliefs, there is always irrational fear. Implicit in the language of the men who want to leave in place the U.S. military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy regarding gays and lesbians in the military is this fear: "Gay guys might rape my ass." The proper response to that is, "Oh, get over yourself, Mary."

Senator John McCain's words and behavior at the Senate Armed Services Committee meeting on DADT was prima facie evidence of the rape fear. "It would also present yet another challenge to our military at a time of already tremendous stress and strain," he offered, adding later, "the military’s mission to prepare for and conduct combat operations requires servicemen and women to accept living and working conditions that are often spartan and characterized by forced intimacy with little or no privacy."

It's as if there's a group of predatory queers out there jonesing for some Marine ass and are willing to sign away a few years of their life to get it. It's as if the notion of openly gay service members (yeah, yeah, ha, ha, "members") will stop all the straight dudes from hanging out nude with other straight dudes, an image that, in any context, is totally gay (as in "homosexual"). Seriously, if you wanna walk around, dangling your junk in front of other guys, there's probably something you need to ask and tell yourself.

Junk-dangling soldiers aside, it's not really as if the straight guys are the models of sexual decorum here. "According to several studies of the US military funded by the Department of Veteran Affairs, 30% of military women are raped while serving, 71% are sexually assaulted, and 90% are sexually harassed," says a BBC report from last year, with an estimate that "some 90% of military sexual assaults are never reported." It's pretty damn likely that the vast majority of those assaults were not committed by lesbians.

Yet conservatives trot out the few examples of harassment or violence by gays and lesbians, as if that minority proves the rule. In a Washington Times editorial, retired Army lawyer Richard Black details a 1991 sexual assault by two male soldiers on a third. Anyone see the problem? Yeah, it was in 1991, when gays were explicitly banned from the military, prior to DADT. That didn't actually stop the assault from happening.

Tony Perkins, whose Family Research Council (motto: "Why doesn't Jesus stop us from going bankrupt?") has a petition against the repeal of DADT, says, "Forcing soldiers to cohabit with people who view them as sexual objects would inevitably lead to increased sexual tension, sexual harassment, and even sexual assault." Or, in other words, the straight dudes might be treated like they treat women. Or, in other words, please don't rape our asses, Mr. Gay Guy.

Indeed, by the right's own logic, the military should ban heterosexual men.

Here's a secret, John McCain, Tony Perkins, and others: Gay guys don't want to rape you. In fact, you're not even remotely attractive to most gay dudes. They do want to serve our country, and, as everyone in the military will tell you, they already do. And if ostensibly straight American males like you are uncomfortable, that's actually your damage.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep, Yep.
That fuckin' Rude nails it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's about justice: straight soldiers see their fellow soldiers being treated unjustly.
I imagine that the idealism that many soldiers have is being hurt by seing the treatment of gay soldiers. Is this what they're fighting for? At every level of our society, from the military to the bansters: It's the injustice, stupid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. "the straight dudes might be treated like they treat women"
And there you have it.

Thank you, Rude Pundit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That is so well said. The hetero rapists are afraid the
Edited on Wed Feb-03-10 02:13 PM by mochajava666
worm will turn, so to speak...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. +1
Yes, thank you Rude!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. So true. Not all gays are tops!
:evilgrin:

On a serious note, I don't know the details of the 1991 incident referred to in the article, but sexual assault should not be confused with "being gay." Plenty of male-on-male sexual assaults are committed by self-described heterosexual men and, often, the victims are also heterosexuals. Sexual assault is about power, not sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. "Sexual assault is about power, not sex"
Edited on Wed Feb-03-10 02:36 PM by WildEyedLiberal
Exactly so. There's relatively small danger of a minority exerting such power over a majority for that very reason. How many gay-on-straight hate or sexual crimes do we hear about? But straight-on-gay crimes, including sexual assault, harassment, and humiliation? Countless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well said Rudie
Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. another one out of the park for the RP.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mcain is a paranoid.
Edited on Wed Feb-03-10 02:07 PM by Froward69




on edit/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think they're more afraid that they will like it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. McCain's ass is so droopy he looks like he's wearing a hoop skirt.
Or so I hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Mental image.
Not good. McLame is a bigoted, old, dried up scum on the bottom of my shoe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. HOMOPHOBE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Please elaborate. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. can't rec, but will kick for RP being right on, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. my response to all those cretins is one word, "tailhook"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC