Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Man Denied French Citizenship Because Wife Wears Veil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:41 AM
Original message
Man Denied French Citizenship Because Wife Wears Veil
You know, I respect that in the Muslim faith that some women may be required to wear something over their head - but most of the time it is non-restrictive. Outside of the hair being covered the woman can still function normally. But sorry, the Burqa is nothing more than a form of domestic abuse. I'm glad the French denied this guy's citizenship. No woman should be forced to be covered so completely that it impairs her sight and ability to move. Hell if I was the French government I'd offer the woman help in escaping that horrible marriage!



Man Denied French Citizenship Because Wife Wears Veil
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/03/man-denied-french-citizen_n_446713.html

A Moroccan man has been denied French citizenship because he demanded his French wife wear a full-face Islamic veil, Reuters reports.

"It emerged during the inquiry and the interview process that this person forced his wife to wear the full veil, deprived her of freedom of movement with her face exposed and rejected the principles of secularism and equality between men and women," France's Immigration Minister Eric Besson said in a statement Tuesday.

France's Le Figaro newspaper obtained a copy of the ruling, which has also been published in English by The Guardian:

"Monsieur X displays in an everyday manner a discriminatory attitude towards women, going as far as refusing to shake their hands and advocating the separation of boys and girls including, at home, of brothers and sisters," the ruling read.

"The lifestyle he has chosen may be justified by religious precepts but is incompatible with the values of the Republic, notably the principle of equality of the sexes."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. when in france do as the french do,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrat_in_Houston Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good!
Last I noticed, citizenship in France is not an automatic right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. France has a pro-secular policy.
They are not nuetral the way the 1st Amendment is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. In this case, I agree with you.
What if the woman saw wearing the veil as a religious duty, a duty she freely accepted. Do you think she and her husband should be rejected for Franch (or American) citizenship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does anyone know what the law is in the US?
All I have ever seen in North Texas is a headscarf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Head scarves are legal in the USA as long as you refer to them as "do-rags"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good for France (and *Islam* does not require a burka; some Arab cultures do...) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. and thank you for the correction
I assumed incorrectly with the usage fo the Burqa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. And some Persian cultures as well
It's quite the hit among the Pashtuns in Afghanistan and Pakistan. A hit among the male Pashtuns at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugaresa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why does Monsieur X want to live in a country where women are considered equals?
I have met men like Monsieur X here in the US, men who were raised to view women as objects. One man in particular had a fit when he found out I was the only expert available to him, I was very offended by his shitty behavior.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. His FRENCH wife? What bloody nerve of him.
There are, however, Christian and Jewish sects not far behind him. NO patriarchal religion really believes in equality of the sexes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. So, she's denied French citizenship because her husband denies her some liberty
Ha ha, that's very logical.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. she is French
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. She is already a citizen of France.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. Good - France is refusing to accept religious fundamentalism.
Unfortunately we encourage it by accepting people like the German family who sought asylum in the US - the parents said they wanted to homeschool their children because textbooks used in school violated the family's religious beliefs; they weren't allowed to pull their kids from school in Germany, but are apparently being welcomed in the US. Give us your delusional, fundy crazies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yes, whatever the United States of America is about ...
Edited on Wed Feb-03-10 05:40 PM by Maat
it's certainly not about honoring fundamental rights, such as the U.S.-Supreme-Court-recognized right-to-parent and the right to determine how one's child is educated, or about the FREEDOM OF CHOICE. It's certainly not a place in which we welcome refugees from oppression.

Let's be tyrannical and have our government tell people how to live within narrow confines. It's for their own good. Let's only admit people who agree with our values.

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. HuffPo's headline is extremely misleading
He wasn't denied citizenship because his wife wore a veil. He was denied citizenship because he demanded his wife wear a veil.

It's like saying that people don't like OJ Simpson because his ex-wife passed away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. "this person forced his wife to wear the full veil," ... are you kidding
me? In France a woman can be "forced" by her husband. Seems to me that the French are disrespecting the woman. Now I agree if she were in an arab country, but in France she can choose to leave him.

That being said, I'm glad they disallowed simply because in this day and age (of suicide bombs, etc) NO ONE should be allowed to be covered to the point of a complete inability to be identified when in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC