Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quakes still rattling Yellowstone but no cause for alarm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 04:38 AM
Original message
Quakes still rattling Yellowstone but no cause for alarm
Edited on Wed Feb-03-10 04:47 AM by theHandpuppet
Still mighty interesting, though.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/01/science/01yellowstone.html
The New York Times
Hundreds of Quakes Are Rattling Yellowstone
By KIRK JOHNSON
Published: January 31, 2010

DENVER — In the last two weeks, more than 100 mostly tiny earthquakes a day, on average, have rattled a remote area of Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, putting scientists who monitor the park’s strange and volatile geology on alert.

Researchers say that for now, the earthquake cluster, or swarm — the second-largest ever recorded in the park — is more a cause for curiosity than alarm. The quake zone, about 10 miles northwest of the Old Faithful geyser, has shown little indication, they said, of building toward a larger event, like a volcanic eruption of the type that last ravaged the Yellowstone region tens of thousands of years ago.

The area is far from any road or community, and the park is relatively empty in winter. Swarms of small quakes, including a significant swarm last year, are relatively common.

But at a time when the disastrous earthquake in Haiti on Jan. 12 has refocused global attention on the earth’s immense store of tectonic energy, scientists say that the Yellowstone swarm, if only because of its volume, bears close observation: as of Sunday, there had been 1,608 quakes since Jan. 17.... MORE

Here are the 3+ quakes since Jan 18:
3.1 2010/02/02 19:31:47 44.559N 110.944W 8.7 17 km (11 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.2 2010/01/28 01:46:15 44.573N 110.977W 12.0 14 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.1 2010/01/27 12:52:16 44.572N 110.963W 10.0 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.1 2010/01/25 03:27:36 44.564N 110.960W 10.3 16 km (10 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.1 2010/01/24 23:21:34 44.566N 110.964W 10.4 16 km (10 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.0 2010/01/24 23:09:46 44.566N 110.964W 8.7 15 km (10 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.6 2010/01/23 15:01:27 43.512N 110.249W 2.5 38 km (24 mi) NNE of Bondurant, WY
3.0 2010/01/22 22:41:16 44.568N 110.972W 10.8 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.0 2010/01/21 22:38:40 44.552N 110.974W 0.1 16 km (10 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.0 2010/01/21 21:09:02 44.559N 110.969W 9.1 16 km (10 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.8 2010/01/20 23:16:19 44.567N 110.968W 9.6 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.7 2010/01/20 23:01:50 44.565N 110.977W 9.0 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.3 2010/01/19 21:41:03 44.569N 110.966W 9.2 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.2 2010/01/19 18:35:37 44.561N 110.968W 9.9 16 km (10 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.5 2010/01/19 14:32:31 44.562N 110.974W 9.3 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.3 2010/01/19 09:48:32 44.566N 110.965W 6.7 16 km (10 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.0 2010/01/18 21:42:14 44.569N 110.968W 9.8 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.4 2010/01/18 20:39:39 44.566N 110.969W 10.2 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.1 2010/01/18 11:03:14 44.560N 110.969W 9.7 16 km (10 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing to see here folks. Move along
Never mind the Supervolcano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Everybody west of the Mississippi should just leave - run away!
or not

The "experts" don't have much of a clue about these things. Not their fault, not that much data on volcanoes, really, and they work on geologic time scales.

But you think we might have learned from Mt St Helens that earthquakes coming from volcanoes might just mean something.
They were caught flat-footed on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cultedelaraison Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Always interested in the Yellowstone Caldera.
Edited on Wed Feb-03-10 05:23 AM by cultedelaraison
Seeing The Road earlier this year made me think of this. I doubt this thing blows anytime soon, and if it does, hey, what are we gonna do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Put Your Heads Between Your Legs And Kiss Your Ass Goodbye
Considering this is a Supervolcano, there aren't many places in the North American continent to hide except for Alaska.

Welcome to DU...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cultedelaraison Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thank you for the welcoming
:hi:

Does anyone know whether or not a lot of the seismic activity occurring at Yellowstone could be in correlation to the quake in Haiti?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I Don't Think So...
Yelllowstone is a hot spot (like Hawaii) where Haiti is on a meeting of several plates with a fault line running right through the country. I think those seismic readings at Yellowstone is measuring the magma moving under the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cultedelaraison Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thank you nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gleaner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. It may be a precursor to a ...
volcanic eruption, but it could also be a precursor to a very large earthquake. That area is very volatile. Years ago when I was a kid there was an earthquake in Yellowstone so big that it created a lake. I don't remember what year it was, but it was in the 1960s.

Swarms of earthquakes like these have been observed and measured before other large earthquakes too. I'm glad I won't be vacationing there anytime soon. But then I live in LA and we are overdue for our big one and have been for some time. Uh, as far as I'm concerned it can be a lot more overdue and I won't complain.:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not so sure I would dismiss this considering it is the second largerst swarm in history..
I wonder what would need to happen to cause "alarm".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Native elders didn't dismiss it a few years back
They took spiritual action...


"While dwelling amid the high mountains along the North American Continental Divide, Bennie LeBeau of the Eastern Shoshone tribe experienced a torrent of dreams and visions, especially in 1999. The visions directed him to set in motion the plans for a massive Medicine Wheel Ceremony.

"Over the last year Bennie has become aware of many sharply distressing changes in both land and animals at Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming. These changes are becoming even more ominous right now, he says, and they have prodded him into direct action to bring his visions alive..." (snip)

http://www.chiron-communications.com/communique%209-2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. thank you for posting that--a very interesting article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's been kind of fun to follow
Swarms are pretty common there, and not necessarily a bad thing. This was has certainly been larger than most, but it's still not as big as 1985, when there were over 3000 earthquakes--those earthquakes were also more powerful (as high as 4.9).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC