Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vanity Fair's "New Hollywood" picks: All white

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
concerned1 Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:54 PM
Original message
Vanity Fair's "New Hollywood" picks: All white
http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/beauty/vanity-fairs-quot-new-hollywood-quot-issue-completely-lacks-diversity-578862/

Vanity Fair's "New Hollywood" issue completely lacks diversity
by Joanna Douglas

One thing magazines love to do is call dibs on who will be the new "It" celebrities in the year to come. Sometimes they pick stars whose careers are destined to take off, occasionally they make incredible calls with near-nobodies who later become A-listers, and usually the majority of their picks fade into oblivion. While we'd like to think celeb bible Vanity Fair puts a great deal of thought and planning into its annual "New Hollywood" issue, this year the editors really limited their scope when it came to choosing the next big stars. (Or perhaps they overemphasized the "Fair"? ) Every woman on its new cover is extremely thin and very, very white. Unless Vanity Fair considers one redhead to be diversity, we feel the need to cry foul...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. What the hell else is new? VF has been doing this for years
I honestly don't think that they realize that black and brown people make and (gasp) occasionally even STAR in Hollywood movies! :eyes:

And the fact that a) many of these girls have already been on VF covers (can someone else have a chance in the spotlight??) and b) we'll probably never hear from many of them ever again seems to be a moot point and secondary to the fawning that must be done over their "patrician features" and "Ivory soap girl loveliness." :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

God, I'm so sick of this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. That just boggles the mind. Thanks for sharing this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC