Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do You Favor Storing Radioactive Nuclear Waste Materials In Your State?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:47 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do You Favor Storing Radioactive Nuclear Waste Materials In Your State?
Edited on Mon Feb-01-10 05:37 PM by Better Believe It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only if it's stored in the basement of the Ohio Republican Party...
just kidding. I do not want it stored inmy state nor transported through it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or in Crawford, Texas? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Well, I DID say it was OK to store it in my state.
And Crawford might be a good place. Maybe for that coal plant, too. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The worry is unjustified.
You're at infinitely greater risk from the half million tons of highly toxic smoke, sludge, and ash produced by the average coal plant, all of which is dumped straight into the environment with no containment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. How about we store it in FOX network studios?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Really depends on how it's stored.
I know a guy in the DOE who is an expert on it. If it's in the way he described: underground sealed bunker type set ups nowhere near the water table in case of some catastrophic leak.

What else can you do with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, but your backyard will suffice.
:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other: I don't care where they store it, as long as it's SAFE. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pretty sure there's already a bunch here
Edited on Mon Feb-01-10 04:54 PM by sandnsea
Not to mention the radioactive waste that comes from various hospitals and industrial facilities. 20% of our power comes from nuclear, so if we're serious about not using it or coal, we should shut off 60% of our electricity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. We do now
Spent fuel rods are generally stored in pools adjacent to nuclear plants, since a national waste repository was never opened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. We're still trying to keep the pollution from the Hanford Nuclear plant
Edited on Mon Feb-01-10 05:00 PM by liberal_at_heart
from leaking into the Columbia River in my state, so my answer is hell no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. They can bury that shit in my yard!
I have a lot of republicans in my neighborhood.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Have Superman sling it into outer space.
Let it be the Martian's problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Not sure if this is a joke or not.....but not a bad idea....
Seriously, if we put it all in a rocket and shoot it into outer space toward some star thats 100 million light years away it will get there when? We'll all be long dead and gone by then and it will just float out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. The more, the better...
Nuclear waste is our friend. It can keep us warm. It can light us up at night. It can rid us of excessive body hair. Its uses are manifold and many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Radiation ... You hear the most outrageous lies about it.
Half-baked, goggle-boxed do-gooders telling everybody it's bad for you. Pernicious nonsense! Everybody could stand a hundred chest X-rays a year. They ought to have 'em too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonathon Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is unrecommended - I see - everyone, support more nuclear power plants

But, let's not talk about the consequences....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. How about
Edited on Mon Feb-01-10 05:24 PM by FBaggins
Unrecced because it's a ridiculously invalid poll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. If N.J. has to take it let's store it at Christie Todd Whitman's "Farm".
If any one in New Jersey deserves to be covered in waste (especially Nuclear) it's the governor that sold our natural resource to the highest bidder. Then the Bush family rewarded her by letting her do the same thing for the entire country.

Besides, Whitman's neighborhood is filled with a bunch of wealthy republicans who keep a few sheep so they don't have to pay the highest property taxes in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't even favor storing on my planet.
Shoot it into the sun.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Absolutely not! What I do favor is........
not creating any more of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. California is full, but there's plenty of room in New Jersey
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. If our state were the best repository then yes, I would accept it. But there are better places
Edited on Mon Feb-01-10 05:27 PM by ThomWV
In New Mexico and South Carolina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh what an unbiased poll! My word this means something doesn't it?
What's wrong with "sure - because we understand how radioactivity works and what materials and conditions can be safe to store radioactive materials, so we don't have to act like scared little kids in 1950s A-bomb-drills"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I try my best to be unbiased and not take a firm position on anything that's important!
Like Pat Paulsen use to say. Not right-wing or left-wing, right down the middle of the bird!

And I only like plain vanilla ice cream.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. Of course not.That's what we have Nevada for. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. How about some balanced and realistic choices.
Like I support storing nuclear waste in my state away from population centers.

OR

They already store nuclear waste in my state (surry nuclear generation station) and I have no problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. This is a scientific, fair and balanced poll.

With a very, very, very, very slight, minor almost insignificant tilt against nuclear power as you may have noticed.

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Fair and balanced enough to be reported on Faux News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Only if it had a pro-nuclear power bent to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. Bullshit push poll is bullshit. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Lighten up. No. I didn't say light up! However, that might help you to lighten up! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC