Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good on Harry Reid: Reid Schedules Vote on Controversial Labor Nominee Before Brown Arrives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:14 PM
Original message
Good on Harry Reid: Reid Schedules Vote on Controversial Labor Nominee Before Brown Arrives




Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has scheduled a key vote Monday afternoon on a controversial Labor Department nominee, even though Republican Sen.-elect Scott Brown has not been sworn in yet.

The vote has riled at least one watchdog group, saying Reid is just trying to ram through the nomination of Patricia Smith for Labor Department solicitor before Republicans have enough votes to block her. And a spokesman for Sen. Mike Enzi, the Republican senator who had put a "hold" on Smith's nomination last year, said Enzi would prefer "all controversial nominations" be put off until Brown is seated.

Enzi, ranking Republican on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, put out a report Monday saying Smith's "lack of candor" in prior testimony before his committee makes her "unqualified" for the post.

Republicans have widely objected to Smith's nomination. Every Republican on the Senate panel screening Smith for the post went on record in opposition back in October, citing "discrepancies" in her congressional testimony. Enzi, R-Wyo., put a hold on the nomination around the same time, meaning Smith would need 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle in the Senate.

Democrats currently have 60 votes, but that number will drop to 59 once Brown is sworn in.

"He'd be the 41st vote (against) cloture," said Don Todd, research director with Americans for Limited Government. He said Reid should hold off, given that he said the Senate would not "rush into anything" after Brown was elected in the Massachusetts special election. At the time, Reid was referring mainly to health care reform.

Asked whether Reid was trying to squeeze in the vote before Brown is seated, a Reid aide said Reid was "committed" to moving the nomination forward early this year because such motions were put off last year due to the health care debate.

"Patricia Smith has been ready for floor consideration since she was reported out of the HELP Committee on Oct. 6 of last year, but Republican senators have blocked her from receiving a vote on the floor," the aide said in an e-mail.

Senate Republicans' concerns are rooted in the creation of a labor initiative in New York during Smith's term as state labor commissioner. The New York Wage Watch program, modeled after neighborhood watch programs, encourages workers to monitor and report labor law violations.

<snip>

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/01/reid-schedules-vote-controversial-labor-nominee-brown-arrives/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope Reid succeeds....just to spite the repukes.
Edited on Mon Feb-01-10 04:38 PM by BrklynLiberal
How many votes were held up until Franken took his seat???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lieberman will probably give them the 41st No vote for the cloture motion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC