Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Administration Budget Contradicts Obama's Pledge to Reduce Nuc Weapons Threat:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 01:51 PM
Original message
Administration Budget Contradicts Obama's Pledge to Reduce Nuc Weapons Threat:


Administration Budget Plan Contradicts Obama Pledge to Reduce Nuclear Weapons Threat
Billions to be spent on new nuclear weapons production facilities


WASHINGTON - February 1 - The Administration's budget, released today, contradicts President Obama's pledge to reduce the nuclear weapons threat by working toward their elimination, according to a national network of groups in communities downwind and downstream from U.S. nuclear sites. Instead, the spending plan boosts funding for nuclear weapons production facilities by $625 million from last year.

The Alliance for Nuclear Accountability (ANA) said that the Obama budget includes large increases for a new plutonium production facility in Los Alamos, New Mexico and for a new highly enriched uranium production facility near Oak Ridge, Tennessee, each estimated to cost about $3 billion. The budget also fails to list a new privately financed $700 million plant, which will produce nonnuclear components for nuclear weapons in Kansas City, Missouri.

"The Administration has argued that the massive increases in nuclear weapons proposed in this budget are necessary to maintain a robust nuclear deterrent," said Jay Coghlan, Director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico, an ANA member group. "This is simply not true. The United States currently has a stockpile of 10,000 warheads that are certified as reliable. The new production facilities proposed in this budget will allow the Department of Energy to introduce untested nuclear weapons designs into the previously reliable nuclear stockpile."

"The plan described in this budget is not about maintaining a reliable nuclear stockpile. It is a multi-billion dollar ‘radioactive pork' construction plan that will reconstitute the nation's ability to produce new nuclear warheads," said Ralph Hutchison, Coordinator of the Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance. "Building new nuclear weapons production facilities makes no sense as the U.S. prepares to participate in this spring's nuclear nonproliferations Treaty Review Conference, where it will try to persuade other nations to reduce arsenal sizes."

snip


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC