Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge orders coroner to change ruling on state trooper's death

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:52 AM
Original message
Judge orders coroner to change ruling on state trooper's death
A judge has given the Lewis County coroner 10 days to remove the word "suicide" from the death certificate of former Washington state trooper - or else.

"Fail not to obey at your own peril," says a court order issued Friday by Thurston County Superior Court Judge Richard Hicks.

In 1998, trooper Ronda E. Reynolds was found dead in her home of a single gunshot to the head. Lewis County Coroner Terry Wilson ruled her death as a suicide at the time. But in 2008, a KOMO investigation highlighted evidence and opinions from experts who believed that Reynolds did not take her own life.

In November 2009, after reviewing the evidence, a jury unanimously decided that coroner Wilson was wrong when he called the death a suicide. The jurors based their decision on a number of inconsistencies in the case, including the position of the gun and the trajectory of the bullet, which did not match a finding of suicide.

But Wilson said he wouldn't change Reynolds' death certificate, and left the issue in the judge's hands.

Judge Hicks issued a ruling Jan. 9 that requires the coroner to remove "suicide" as the cause of death.

The judge's latest order requires Wilson to "reconsider all of the information and evidence available" and issue a new cause of death within 10 days."The jury found that your determination of 'suicide' is inaccurate," the judge's order says.

Under the latest ruling, the cause of death can't be suicide unless the coroner uncovers new evidence that outweighs the evidence considered by the jury.

The order does not require the coroner to list the cause of death as "homicide," but the jurors who reviewed the case had no doubts about it. Jury forewoman Angel Hubbard said everyone on the jury thought the cause of death was homicide.

"I can say unanimously for all of us - we even talked about that - that we definitely felt it would not, it should not be undetermined, but (move) more towards homicide," said Hubbard.

Nevertheless, Hicks granted a request from Wilson's attorney, John Justice, that jurors' written speculation about the case being a homicide be stricken from the record.

Reynolds' mother Barb Thompson has been fighting ever since 1998 to remove the stigma of suicide from her daughter's name after the lead detective in the investigation outlined a number of inconsistencies in the case.

But she acknowledges that her fight may not be over. Wilson still has the opportunity to appeal this decision.
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/414857_coroner31.html?source=rss

Now this is fishy. What was somebody trying to cover up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. The coroner may be protecting the murderer.
So many coroners and so many murderers. Eventually, a coroner has to want to protect a murderer somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. so now jurors are medical doctors?
This is a somewhat dangerous precedent. Maybe the coroner is incorrect -- or maybe the coroner is simply trying to do his duty and this is his honest conclusion. But for non-medical jurors to draw a medical conclusion, in opposition to a trained professional, could lead down some some troubling paths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Coroners can be
elected officials in some areas. I'm not sure about this area, but I know that has been the case although it is being phased out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like the coroner values his career more then the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC