Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Juror in Roeder trial: Guilty verdict was unanimous as soon as we entered deliberations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:25 PM
Original message
Juror in Roeder trial: Guilty verdict was unanimous as soon as we entered deliberations
Edited on Sun Jan-31-10 10:52 PM by ck4829
In some people's minds, the abortion issue is forever entwined with Scott Roeder's killing of George Tiller.

But abortion never came up in jurors' brief deliberations Friday at the end of Roeder's trial, the jury foreman said in an interview Saturday with The Eagle.

"It was never spoken of," said the 54-year-old, whose first service as a juror came in a trial that drew reporters and activists on both sides of the abortion issue from coast to coast.

He said the jury discussed only the question of whether Roeder was guilty of first-degree murder for shooting Tiller while Tiller served as an usher in his Wichita church, and whether Roeder was guilty of aggravated assault for pointing a handgun at two people who tried to block his escape.

Because of security concerns, the juror asked that his name not be used. He said he didn't want to take any chances that someone might lash out against him.

The guilty verdict was unanimous from the beginning of the deliberations, he said.

"There wasn't much to argue about."

They found the evidence against Roeder "overwhelming."

That's why it took only 37 minutes to decide, he said.

In the juror's mind, Roeder hurt himself with his testimony —"how he plotted this for a number of years." It showed premeditation, the juror said.

The evidence was solid, he said. "The trial was really based on cold, hard facts... undisputable facts."

He couldn't help watching Roeder, noting that throughout the trial Roeder never smiled, never reacted —"just kind of a blank look on his face, no matter what was said."

http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/1718537.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kudos to all those jurors, and esp. to the one who spoke out...
The nation deserves to hear the truth.

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. My thanks to the juror
He and his colleagues did a very difficult thing. But it was the right thing. And I hope the judge throws the book at that no good murdering son of a bitch Scott Roeder when it comes time to sentence him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe the juror represents well over 95% of the country
I have no idea why we let this vanishingly small - albeit violently terroristic - minority rule the discussion in this country. One might almost conclude that terrorist tactics work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Scott Roeder's going to get what he deserves, and I hope...
That he spends every single day behind bars, being driven crazy by the constant noise and yelling on his prison block.
I hope it penetrates his stupid thick skull like a Black and Decker drill into the temple.
I hope he suffers every day that remains in his worthless life.
And I hope he dies in his bed as his cellmate takes a dump in the cell toilet.

And even THAT ain't what this prick deserves.

And FUCK YOU "Operation Rescue".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Grateful thanks to those jurors. Let Roeder rot in prison. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:23 PM
Original message
But, OMG, the judge let Roeder put on a defense!

There's no great surpirse here.

Asking a random group of people to get to the bottom of a murder which was committed in public view of a number of witnesses is not rocket science.

It would be like putting environmentalists on a jury for the Unabomber. When instructed as to the elements of a murder charge, it's not going to matter whether anyone is sympathetic to the professed "rationale" for killing a person in cold blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. But, OMG, the judge let Roeder put on a defense!

There's no great surpirse here.

Asking a random group of people to get to the bottom of a murder which was committed in public view of a number of witnesses is not rocket science.

It would be like putting environmentalists on a jury for the Unabomber. When instructed as to the elements of a murder charge, it's not going to matter whether anyone is sympathetic to the professed "rationale" for killing a person in cold blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. killing tiller in churh
a very bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC